Opinion & Analysis
Bashing or brilliance? The value of Mickelson’s latest media stumble
Phil Mickelson’s recent comments about Ryder Cup Captain Tom Watson are the latest addition to “Mickelson’s Greatest Hits.” And whether you thought Phil was right for speaking his mind in response to a direct question, or you think he was out of line, likely depends on how you feel about “Phil being Phil.”
The thing is, for as much as Mickelson is criticized for his comments, there’s sometimes a lot of value in what he says — and his Ryder Cup comments about Watson could end up being the most valuable of his controversial statements through the years.
Sure, there were regrettable moments such as his claim that Tiger Woods was using inferior equipment and texting commissioner Finchem from the fairway in 2012 to complain about fans having phones. While you might not agree with his comments, you should acknowledge his willingness to speak his mind on topics such as his tax situation in California and making the case that Ryder Cup players should be paid. As wrong as you think he might have been, what other high-profile Tour player would ever say such things?
That brings us to Mickelson’s criticism of U.S. Ryder Cup Captain Tom Watson in the post-event press conference, while Watson sat just a few seats from the disgruntled veteran.
Here’s the full transcript of what Phil the Thrill had to say (He jumped at the chance to answer a question posed to anyone on the ’08 team):
Q. Anyone that was on the team at Valhalla, can you put your finger on what worked in 2008 and what hasn’t worked since?
PHIL MICKELSON: There were two things that allow us to play our best I think that Paul Azinger did, and one was he got everybody invested in the process. He got everybody invested in who they were going to play with, who the picks were going to be, who was going to be in their pod, who — when they would play, and they had a great leader for each pod. In my case, we had Ray Floyd, and we hung out together and we were all invested in each other’s play. We were invested in picking Hunter that week; Anthony Kim and myself and Justin were in a pod, and we were involved on having Hunter be our guy to fill our pod. So we were invested in the process. And the other thing that Paul did really well was he had a great game plan for us, you know, how we were going to go about doing this. How we were going to go about playing together; golf ball, format, what we were going to do, if so-and-so is playing well, if so-and-so is not playing well, we had a real game plan. Those two things helped us bring out our best golf. And I think that, you know, we all do the best that we can and we’re all trying our hardest, and I’m just looking back at what gave us the most success. Because we use that same process in The Presidents Cup and we do really well. Unfortunately, we have strayed from a winning formula in 2008 for the last three Ryder Cups, and we need to consider maybe getting back to that formula that helped us play our best.
Q. That felt like a pretty brutal destruction of the leadership that’s gone on this week.
PHIL MICKELSON: Oh, I’m sorry you’re taking it that way. I’m just talking about what Paul Azinger did to help us play our best. It’s certainly — I don’t understand why you would take it that way. You asked me what I thought we should do going toward to bring our best golf out and I go back to when we played our best golf and try to replicate that formula.
Q. That didn’t happen this week?
PHIL MICKELSON: Uh (pausing) no. No, nobody here was in any decision. So, no.
The buried lede in this widely reported story: While the form of Mickelson’s comments may have been inappropriate, they amount to a brilliant stratagem: getting those invested in the process talking about Paul Azinger’s winning tactics in 2008 and the possibility of bringing Azinger back as a captain.
Thus, Phil took a gamble and did something entirely ill advised, yes. However, if the U.S. Ryder Cup team in 2016 under Paul Azinger or a coach employing his pod system wins the Cup, Mickelson fans and foes alike will return to Lefty’s press conference as the origin of the winning effort.
Club Junkie
Tour Edge Exotics mini driver review + TaylorMade Spider ZT Max first look – Club Junkie
On this episode of Club Junkie, I put the new Tour Edge Exotics Mini Driver to the test and break down the performance, forgiveness, distance, and where it fits compared to a traditional driver or strong fairway wood. If you have been curious about adding a mini driver to the bag, this one is worth a look.
I also dive into the new TaylorMade Spider ZT Max putter that was recently spotted and discuss the growing zero torque putter trend. Plus, there is a closer look at the new Project X Titan Yellow shaft showing up on the PGA Tour and what makes it different from other profiles currently out there.
Opinion & Analysis
AVL: We’re talking about practice! My best tips for taking your game to the course
With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game.
Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills.
While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice.
This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times.
Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy.
One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length. Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine.
It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season.
Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds.
Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time. With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game. Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills. While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice. This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times. Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy. One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length.
Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine. It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season. Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds. Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time.
For Korean golfers, we always look forward to the last of the kkot-saem-chu-I for the true start of a new golf season. The term refers to a cold snap, but literally translates as “winter being jealous of the flowers beginning to bloom, thus lashing out one final time before surrendering to spring”.
A rather poetic mouthful packed into a short expression.
Koreans can be like that. Understated, yet oddly expressive at the same time. And nowhere is this more true on the golf course and in our golf bags. In fact, I suspect many Korean golfers look forward to new apparel and accessory drops more than they do actual equipment launches each year.
At this point, Korean golf fashion may exist on its own timeline. (courtesy of @seonbi_golfer)
There is ample evidence to support that suspicion. Korea is the world’s third-largest golf market behind the United States and Japan, yet its appetite for golf apparel exceeds that of both countries combined. Recent estimates suggest that Korea accounts for nearly 40 percent of the global golf apparel market, placing it among the world’s most influential golf fashion markets and punching well above its size.
Simply, we care deeply about how new golf clubs look and feel, but enjoy looking good while swinging them even more.
Golfers in the West may laugh and say that golf is played on a course, not a fashion runway. Perhaps. But what’s the harm in trying to look and feel good, if the added self-confidence can help actual performance? It certainly seems to have worked for Jason Day, who may have unlocked a new stats category: dormant strokes gained. Coincidence?
During the COVID-era, estimates placed the market near $9 billion, an astonishing figure for a single country.
As a proud member of Gen X, I’ve witnessed the highs and lows of golf fashion firsthand. The pleated trousers and wing-tipped shoes of Jack Nicklaus, the stylish plus-fours and knickers of Payne Stewart, the baggy black trousers and fitted mock-necks of Tiger Woods, and the thigh-hugging athletic tailoring of Rory McIlroy. Golf fashion, like the golf swing itself, has rarely stood still.
But nowhere have those trends shifted, evolved, and been scrutinized quite as relentlessly as in Korea. Here, golf fashion moves faster than fairway gossip, and consumers dissect brands with a level of discernment that can be both impressive and mildly terrifying. New brands are studied, judged, embraced, or dismissed with startling efficiency.
The result is a consumer base with one of the sharpest eyes for quality and authenticity anywhere in the world. It is difficult to quantify, but easy to recognize. Clean lines without trying too hard. Luxury mixed with utility. Trend awareness balanced by restraint and purpose.
It’s golf fashion shaped by one of the world’s most style-literate cities, something I like to call Seoul Sensibilities, referring to the taste level forged by a uniquely competitive environment.
And increasingly, global brands have noticed.
Many golf brands in Korea have their own flagship shops dedicated to apparel only
Titleist understood this years ago, when its apparel business in Korea took on a life of its own under new ownership and local direction. What had once been a straightforward extension of an iconic equipment giant became something sharper and more premium. By going all in on the serious Tour-player look (I couldn’t even fit into their XL sizes), Titleist struck the right chord with Korean consumers and helped its fledgling apparel business break into the mainstream. Titleist became a household name even for non-golfers who wore its caps, shirts, and windbreakers in daily life. In many ways, it proved that even heritage golf brands could carry real fashion credibility when viewed through a Korean lens.
Several years later, PXG took a page out of Titleist’s playbook and followed suit. Korean consumers helped transform the brand from one known largely for irons and loud commercials into something broader and more stylish. PXG apparel’s growth in Korea was explosive, where it found an early audience and turned the category into something more than mere logo merchandise. It is still hard to walk anywhere in Seoul without seeing its palindrome logo.
Malbon’s meteoric rise in the United States was genuine, but its ascent into a global golf lifestyle brand owes much to Korea, where it was elevated by a market already fluent in modern golf style. Korea did not simply embrace Malbon. It pressure-tested the concept, refined its appeal, and helped push it into the global spotlight.
As such, new brands may arrive from abroad, but more often than not, their sharpest evolution happens here. If a brand can earn credibility in Seoul, it’s deemed to have passed one of the toughest style audits in the game.
That is why the next meaningful chapter may not come from outside, but from a Korean brand moving in the opposite direction, carrying those Seoul Sensibilities outward as K-pop once did.
Play young Stay dope.
From Seoul, With Intent
Khalhon is a label that feels less like a trend-chasing newcomer and more like the product of a market that has already seen everything. Golfers here have long been surrounded by luxury logos, technical fabrics, and tour uniforms disguised as lifestyle wear and vice-versa. In other words, novelty alone rarely lasts here, and the Koreans seems to understand that instinctively.
Its style language leans into clean silhouettes, relaxed but tailored proportions, muted palettes, and premium materials that speak quietly but confidently. There is a modern city aesthetic running through it all, with strong layering pieces, thoughtful textures, and subtle branding that suggests sophistication rather than demanding attention.
“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
Most importantly, the garments seem designed to blur the line between golfwear and everyday style. Shirts, trousers, knitwear, and outer layers move comfortably between a game of screen golf, a lunch reservation, an airport gate, or an afternoon coffee in Gangnam with friends.
It raises the question of whether this is golfwear that happens to look good off the course, or everyday clothing that performs beautifully on the fairways.
Personally, I have long appreciated Nike Golf for its clean, athletic modernization of golf attire. It also has the useful side effect of making me look like a more serious golfer than I probably am. But off the course, there are times when being instantly identified as the golf guy in a crowd of non-golfers can feel a touch self-conscious.
“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
That is part of what drew me to Khalhon, which seemed to blend golf and everyday wear naturally. While some of the outfits may be slightly beyond my personal confidence level, the brand also offers tasteful options for older guys like me who still want to express a little personality without regretting the decision later.
These are not simply flashy outfits worn on the course and then banished to the closet until the next tee time. They work surprisingly well off the course too, and I suspect many of the pieces will still look right a couple of years from now, which would certainly be kinder to my wallet than most golf fashion trends tend to be.
And perhaps that broader lifestyle positioning also helps explain why someone like Sean Wotherspoon would find Khalhon creatively interesting in the first place.
“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
“Korea is not only one of the most fashion-forward golf markets in the world, but one of the most fashion-forward markets globally. Korea is ahead, and I love to watch and try to catch up.” – Sean Wotherspoon, Creative Director at Khalhon
Seoul and Beyond
If Khalhon’s rise says something about where Korean golf fashion is today, its relationship with Sean Wotherspoon says even more about where it is heading.
For readers less familiar with Sean Wotherspoon, his arrival at Khalhon is not some routine celebrity endorsement or influencer collaboration. In design and streetwear circles, Wotherspoon is regarded as one of the more influential creative voices of his generation, particularly when it comes to blending nostalgia, storytelling, and contemporary culture into products that people can connect with.
He first gained widespread attention through his now-famous Nike sneaker collaborations, where his vintage-inspired designs and instinct for color helped turn him into one of the defining artists of the late-2010s sneaker era. His work gradually expanded beyond footwear into apparel, automotive collaborations, collectibles, and broader lifestyle design.
Modern golf style now extends well beyond the fairways, where performance and functionality are largely expected by default. And while plenty of brands already make technically competent golfwear, Khalhon seems more focused on designing clothes people would genuinely want to wear even after the round ends.
And when guys at Wotherspoon’s level show genuine interest in working with a Korean golf brand as its new Creative Director, fashion circles tend to sit up and pay attention. There’s already a huge buzz among the fashion-conscious here about upcoming collabs with iconic sports stars and brands.
“My creative direction for Khalhon is disruptive, colorful, nostalgic, and modern. My goal is to blend these avenues seamlessly within each collection.” – Sean Wotherspoon
In chatting with Sean, what stood out most to me was how genuinely energized he sounded about the project itself. Despite having already worked across and countless other creative spaces, he described golf as a completely fresh category for him, saying that Khalhon “will be an amazing vehicle for my design work.”
At the same time, his enthusiasm seemed tied just as much to Korea itself. He spoke openly about admiring Korea’s fashion culture while repeatedly insisting he is still a terrible golfer.
There was something oddly refreshing about that humility. Rather than sounding like a celebrity parachuting into golf simply because the category suddenly became fashionable, Sean sounded genuinely curious about what Korea might do with the category next.
And perhaps that is what makes Khalhon feel interesting right now. The brand feels less like a trend-chaser and more like the natural result of a market now confident enough to export its own point of view.
For years, global brands came to Korea to sharpen their image against one of the most discerning audiences anywhere. Now, a Korean label appears ready to send those Seoul Sensibilities outward instead.
Which brings us back to kkot-saem-chu-i.
That final cold snap before spring always arrives with a reminder that seasons are changing, whether we notice it immediately or not. Golf fashion feels a little like that right now as well, as the old boundaries between sport, streetwear, luxury, and everyday style continue to soften.
And somewhere in Seoul, a Korean golf label already seems prepared for whatever season comes next. I just hope they have everything in my size.
Aaron Rai’s winning WITB: 2026 PGA Championship
Russell Henley’s winning WITB: 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge
Photos from the 2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
CJ Cup Byron Nelson Tour Report: Koepka and Kim’s newest putters finally get hot
Charles Schwab Challenge Tour Report: MacIntyre, Åberg and Spaun all switch putters, TaylorMade launches new Spider
Details on J.J. Spaun’s surprise putter switch
GolfWRX Launch Report: 2026 Titleist GTS drivers
Photos from the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge
PGA Championship Tour Report: Fitzpatrick, Koepka among big-name putter switches for Aronimink
Photos from the ShopRite LPGA
Maria Torres WITB 2026 (June)
Driver: Ping G440 LST (9 degrees) Shaft: Accra TourZ Green 5-M4 3-wood: Ping G440 Max (15 degrees) Shaft: Accra TourZ Green 6-M4 5-wood: Ping G440...
Eric Cole WITB 2026 (June)
Driver: PXG Lightning Tour Max (9 degrees) Shaft: Project X Titan Yellow 70 TX 3-wood: TaylorMade Qi4D (15 degrees) Shaft:...
Si Woo Kim WITB 2026 (May)
Driver: Callaway Quantum Triple Diamond (8.5 degrees) Shaft: Fujikura Ventus Black 6 X Mini driver: Callaway Paradym Ai Smoke Mini...
Wyndham Clark’s winning WITB: 2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
Driver: TaylorMade Qi4D (10.5 degrees) Shaft: Project X Titan Yellow 60 TX 3-wood: TaylorMade Qi4D Tour (15 degrees) Shaft: Project...
Fred
Oct 2, 2014 at 8:19 am
In my view, the US side doesn’t know how to win in match play team formats. US golf culture is about individual play in a stroke play format. In match play teams, you have to consider your partner and roll with the punches if he lets you down. You have to pick him up. US players aren’t accustomed to that – not that they don’t understand it – it’s that they are pretty green at it. Think Tiger and Phil together… Azinger’s methods helped overcome that in that the team pod and it’s leader defined everyone’s roles. Egos had to be checked in his system and they bought in. That is key, when you consider the culture of US me-oriented players. Euros are more supportive, their comraderie extends beyond one weekend every two years. When a US guy lets his team down, it’s seems like he let his whole nation down. As a culture of braggarts, US culture requires that you back it up. When you don’t, your confidence is shot. Not sure how to change the culture (do we need Patrick Reed’s antics?) but the US needs to change its mindset of winning these types of events and have a gameplan everyone is invested in.
Duh
Oct 5, 2014 at 1:45 am
Yeah, that’s why they won in 2008 more in the team matches than in the Singles. Duh.
ND Hickman
Oct 7, 2014 at 7:47 am
I think that 2008 had more to do with the fact that Flado was easily the worst captain Europe has ever seen.
Larry
Oct 2, 2014 at 3:39 am
To those of us watching in Asia, the Europeans always talk like they are really lucky to be selected for the Ryder team. Whereas some of the American players give the impression the US team is really lucky to have them…likewise many of the international players in the Presidents Cup.
stu
Oct 1, 2014 at 6:36 pm
I think people are forgetting two things here, firstly, they are all professional golfers who play against each other most weeks of the year, this should be no different, play those singles matches this week and U.S. probably win 7/5…Foursomes is where they lost it.
Secondly, the U.S. won against a team organised by Nick Faldo, arguably Europe’s least popular Captain EVER…!!
So Azinger’s method only gets credence from the fact that it has won Presidents cup matches , not for beating Faldos team…
Phil was asked a question that he gave an honest answer to, however his frustrations of not playing Saturday and not being consulted leaked into the statement and suddenly it sounds like hes throwing digs at Tom, I think he has earned the right to be one of very few people that could question someone of Watsons stature but I think he was just comparing two separate methods.. one of which happened to be Azinger’s, a system utilised successfully in Presidents cup that could easily be adopted for a similar format in Ryder cup again..
At the end of the day the players still have to go out and perform, and Europe just had more guys do it on the day..
bo
Oct 1, 2014 at 6:26 pm
ok, here’s the thing…of course it comes down to players executing shots, but you have to blame Captain Watson for NOT putting players into positions to succeed. Not even mentioning Captain picks…
Did anyone think Phil stood a chance on Friday afternoon after walking 18 brutal holes in a grueling match in the morning? The dudes is 45, has arthritis and needed a blow. Watson failing to put his players in a good position.
Should Rickie and Jimmy have been playing a fourth straight match when they were clearly exhausted? no way. again a failure by the Captain.
If Watson had sat Phil and Keegan on Fri afternoon, he could have played Spieth/Reed and had a rested Mick/Keegan Sat morning – allowing Rickie/Jimmy to get some rest.
Especially since Phil/Kee are great in FourBall, and Ricky/Jimmy had been good in Foursomes. Win/win all around.
Just switching those three matches around, the RC gets a lot closer…
Terrible job as a Captain. Players cant execute when they arent on the field, or are worn down from too many minutes.
Jack Nash
Oct 1, 2014 at 4:09 pm
Phil’s downfall came on the Plane Ride to the Ryder Cup. There were 11 U.S. Players on that flight, none of them named Mickleson. Like they said on golf Channel you support your Captain, you don’t throw him AND his plan under the Bus. You do that in private. What a teammate Phil is. I guess he went home on his own Jet also. Good for you Phil. No wonder the U.S. Has been getting hammered. Players of your era, like they said on GC are rated some of if not the best on the Planet yet are nowhere to be found on Ryder Cup weekend.
bo
Oct 1, 2014 at 6:18 pm
hard for Phil to put up points when he is on the bench or playing 36 after a grueling win thru 18 in the morning.
Mike
Oct 4, 2014 at 9:11 am
It was agreed that Phil was going on a different plane due to business he had over there. No one had a problem with it.
gd4me
Oct 1, 2014 at 3:20 pm
I’ve read and listened to this exchange a number of times now, and I still don’t see how people are saying that Phil criticized Tom Watson. He was asked what worked in 2008 and answered that question, with the truth as he sees it (me too BTW). He was then goaded into saying he attacked Tom Watson, but he clearly stated that was misconstrued by the reporter. I’m not a huge Phil fan, but in this case I have to say he was innocent of the charges, was not whining, and provided an insightful response. Seems like the negative responders are the whining little beoches, not Phil. What’s the matter, no Tiger to pick on so you dig up someone else?
Domino
Oct 3, 2014 at 1:40 pm
I totally agree, he was asked a question and actually answered it, then everyone wants to say he was unfairly attacking Watson. Should he have just made something up? I thought it was great to hear an honest answer for once.
Regis
Oct 1, 2014 at 2:23 pm
We seem to forget that match play is the format at the Cup. We get our butt kicked in alternate shot because the Euros are better shot makers. Work the ball from both sides, flight the ball, manufacture a shot out of trouble. We pick our team based upon their performance in American designed courses. The Euros grow up playing in the wind, tougher conditions, less manicured courses. It carries over to match play and especially alternate shot.
Bill
Oct 4, 2014 at 8:13 pm
Prior to the 2014 debacle, according to Ryder Cup statistics, the Americans were 53.5 to 58.5 in foursomes, 46.5 to 65.5 in four-ball and 84.5 to 83.5 in singles. This doesn’t sound like the Americans get the “butt kicked” in alternate shot, as you say. GM isn’t a basket-case of an international automotive company because of bad management, or bad labor, or bad government. It’s a group effort that turns success into failure. In the Ryder cup, it takes the combined effort of the PGA of America, the captain it picks, along with the process, the players, the site, the setup, and the management of the event to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
Never once have I heard that Americans are incapable of succeeding, except from the “wussy-boy” press types. The PGA of America needs to get their collective old-fossil heads out of their you-know-what and start thinking like can-do Americans, instead of their fascist European brethren, to begin fixing the losing ways they have created and fostered for the last 25 years.
Joe
Oct 7, 2014 at 12:32 am
I’m pretty sure you have no idea what fascism is. Especially considering that there isn’t a single country in Europe with a fascist government, and hasn’t been one in…….oh, about 80 years. Learn some history man, you’re embarrassing us.
ForgedIron
Oct 1, 2014 at 1:35 pm
Butthurt millionaires whining that their Hall of Fame captain isn’t nice to the them. Boo hoo. Make some putts.
Airbender
Oct 1, 2014 at 1:39 pm
He needs somebody to write a better whinning script.
Robert
Oct 1, 2014 at 2:40 pm
Have you really never experienced the difference between having a good boss and a bad boss?
Airbender
Oct 1, 2014 at 1:35 pm
Phil is a sore loser (Blame other people first). Kinda remind me of Allan Iverson.
Be a team player man!
bo
Oct 1, 2014 at 6:19 pm
we talkin bout practice…
TR1PTIK
Oct 1, 2014 at 12:22 pm
I haven’t really cared that much about all of this, but finally took the time to read the transcript and watch the video. Though it is obvious how one could take Phil’s statements negatively, the truth is he never really addressed Watson’s role as Ryder Cup Captain except for saying that the players weren’t as involved in the process as they were in 2008 with Azinger. This is a total non-issue and people should find something else to gripe about.
jay gaydos
Oct 1, 2014 at 12:46 pm
Totally agree.
The media, as usual, has to create an issue when there is no issue.
Skip Miller
Oct 1, 2014 at 11:49 am
Why the caption “media stumble”? As with his play, Phil Mickelson has always been a “what you see is what you get” guy. He is straight forward, apparently honest, and speaks his mind in an intelligent and forthright manner when asked a question. What a constant flow of “fresh air” when we otherwise have “media speak” and “political correctness” being force fed to us on a daily basis.
My advice to you so called journalists…. listen to the answers these guys give. Print the questions and answers verbatim, quit the failing attempts to psychologically dissect answers looking for more than what is there, keep your analysis in context with the question and respective answer, ditch the sensationalistic headlines, and quit the bashing.
Remember your mother’s read your articles. They are individually and collectively embarrassed that you can’t apply what they taught you at kindergarten level….”if you can’t say something nice, then don’t say anything at all” and most of all “don’t start rumors”….
Allen
Oct 1, 2014 at 10:36 am
Phil would have a complaint if he had a great Ryder Cup record. Heck make him the captain next time, lets see how he would do it.
Mike
Oct 1, 2014 at 12:46 pm
How was Phil complaining? He didn’t offer this statement. He was asked a question and gave his honest answer. Stop listening to the biased media hype and actually listen to what was asked and how he answered.
Don
Oct 1, 2014 at 10:35 am
It’s going to be so awesome when Phil becomes Ryder Cup Captain. Controversy or not, appropriate or not, every golf outlet is going to insure that they have every Phil quote lined up for when he either succeeds or fails. It’s going to be glorious!
john
Oct 1, 2014 at 8:29 am
This is what a real Ryder Cup captain does. http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/golf/29442461
RogerinNZ
Oct 1, 2014 at 5:23 am
Phil answered a question, offered an opinion.
Thats life.
The European Team pulled of The Big Saves and Won.
Thats life.
Nobody wanted a Draw did they?
gplfing
Oct 1, 2014 at 5:19 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Everything Is AWESOME!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etzMjoH0rJw
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Abraham Lincoln
Golf marketing or management is not done correctly over that side of the pound, it needs young people, don’t bench Dustin..Anthony…and many
others, young people is the future of the game, new thinking, the show
is run by TM CEO and PGA old snobs… not AWESOME!!!
Read more at http://www.golfwrx.com/246473/mickelsons-bashing-of-watson-could-be-his-most-important-media-stumble/comment-page-1/#YsTtt9TuZrJXX2xW.99
antonio
Oct 1, 2014 at 4:20 am
Too much credit to Azinger and his methods. It was as simple as the americans clearly outplayed the europeans that week and team Europe was led by the worst captain ever in Ryder Cup history (captain calamity)
ParHunter
Oct 1, 2014 at 9:47 am
I think you might have a point here. Hardly anyone on the European team liked the captain that year given that he slated everyone at some point before.
RobCH
Oct 2, 2014 at 11:33 am
Whereas Tom Watson waited until the competition was under way before slating his players…
Peter
Oct 1, 2014 at 3:26 am
I think Azinger and his Pod-system is given way too much credit for the 2008 US win. IMO most of the outcome comes down to the form of the players during the 3 Days of play.
Also, it doesnt help the team-spirit having players who can’t handle being benched, even though their performance suggests it’s a good idea to rest them.
It seems PM:s presser comments were more premeditated then just random spur of the moment thoughts.
ChiefKeef
Oct 1, 2014 at 1:49 am
This should and will be forgotten within 2 weeks. Hell, Sergio said some extremely RACIST things regarding Tiger not too long ago and that has been completely forgotten in the media. What’s worse…racist comments or criticizing a Ryder Cup captain? Give me a freakin break. Watson did a shitty job and probably should have gotten WORSE comments from the players. The Ryder Cup is just a big blow-hard weekend anyway…a bunch of fake fist-pumps and annoying leprechauns yelling “c’mon!” Useless article and I can’t even comprehend why I’m wasting my time commenting on it.
TMTC
Oct 4, 2014 at 10:51 am
You talk about racist comments! …..and you call the Europeans “Leprechauns”
What a moron.
Yam
Oct 1, 2014 at 1:25 am
Tabloid bull. What a bore this piece of writing is.
Here is Phil, not afraid to speak his mind, candidly, and he gets bashed for being American, speaking out loud, his mind. What has America come to, really?
zoots
Oct 1, 2014 at 1:16 am
Very unprofessional on Phil’s part. Just crying because he got benched. Voice grievances in private to US RC bigwigs, not a public presser. Pods shmods as far as I’m concerned, US up 10-6 in 2012 (10-4 at one point) without pods. Shat the bed in singles, nothing to do with pods. Yeah Watson made some questionable decisions, so does every captain. America obviously weakened this year without the likes of Woods, DJ, Duff.
TMTC
Oct 4, 2014 at 10:58 am
Take a look at Eldrick’s Rider Cup record.
It is poor, and in his present form, would most likely have been even worse this year!
I agree with your comments on DJ & Duff.
Joseph
Oct 1, 2014 at 12:19 am
I think Phil’s comments were made at a time were all were frustrated a bit. I think as time goes on, he’ll regret some of the things he said publicly. I don’t think going back to a POD system that worked one time is the long term answer. No disrespect to Azinger at all. I think the US needs multiple things to happen in order to turn this great event back into a rivalry. Unfortunately, the European team is loaded for several years to come with several top level players. If you look at US golf right now, Tiger and Phil are aging and not what they once used to be. I don’t see anyone on the US side that’s going to give Rory a run for his money at this point. Clearly the younger players have benefitted the US team. I simply think they have more fire in their bellies. They’re tougher. I think Furyk and Mickelson have played in their last RC. Thanks to them for all they’ve done for American golf, but its time to move in a new direction.
Larry
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:41 pm
I think I played golf long enough to know there is only one shot in golf that gets the ball in the hole 99% of the time, and that is the putt…and I did not see Tom Watson putt once…
Alex
Sep 30, 2014 at 9:22 pm
That’s not an accurate transcript.
Please, relisten to it. The question is, “Phil and anyone else…?”
He didn’t jump at the chance. The question was addressed to him first, then anyone else who might have been there.
This is a misquote and it changes the context of the article.
That’s pretty bad. I realize not all of us have journalism degrees or backgrounds but you can’t quote someone like that.
Gary Lewis
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:23 pm
The Captain can indeed have a positive effect on the outcome albeit maybe hard to measure. Perhaps Zinger was a better Captain. I really don’t have much of a clue on that. Ultimately the players have to execute and play in whatever formats they are assigned to play in. The US just got outplayed. I have some doubt as to whether a different strategy would have made much of a difference in this kind of a beating.
Matthew Carter
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:37 pm
Ben: you need to make sure info is accurate before telling a story. Each time TW was shown on TV, he looked as though he wasn’t in a good place. Looking at PM, you had thought it was party…. He was grinning ear to ear and definitely enjoying the moment. I can’t speak for the American team, but I can say that the Euros know how to have fun and more times than not, they get the job done.
Players ought to pick the Captain…..euros do it why can’t we.?
Maybe we ought to make it a AA verses EU Ryder Cup. Americans and Aussies!!!!
Maybe we ought to pick players after FedEx. Billy and Chris would have put up a lot of points for the US.
Mat
Oct 1, 2014 at 12:13 am
Alex, when should the facts ever get in the way of “journalism”? This is why people don’t speak what they’re thinking. Context is liberally twisted to fit the narrative. GolfWRX and the author should print a correction here.
Alex
Oct 1, 2014 at 1:54 am
Unfortunately so.
I’ve made plenty of mistakes myself, so I’m not going to place undue blame on anyone…it happens.
However…this is why there are editors in place, to verify the premises and check the facts.
west
Sep 30, 2014 at 8:30 pm
Oh, and it was Europe that did the bashing…not Phil.
marcel
Sep 30, 2014 at 8:07 pm
basically what Phil says is -that Anzinger made everyone work hard and otherwise US team is just a bunch of rich kids that otherwise dont care unless you kicking their butts like Anzinger did in 2008…
John Merrill
Sep 30, 2014 at 7:59 pm
It appears most didn’t bite on this journalist’s attempt to bait and create controversy. Phil just answered a direct question with a thought-provoking response. Some are thrown off by honest opinions, I guess? (Typical follow-up question to suggest it was a “brutal” assessment of Watson).
I do think the Captain’s picks were pathetic. Even most of the qualifiers were not on-form in recent months. This needs to be addressed. That said, even with the best 12, there’s no guaranteed of a win. The competition is too close. Even this time, if the US wins one more match each day – different outcome.
John
Sep 30, 2014 at 7:47 pm
I’m glad most respondents didn’t bite on this journalist’s attempt to create a controversy. Phil answered a direct question with his thought-provoking reply – nothing more. Typical press follow up to suggest it was a “brutal” attack on Watson. We did not have the best 12 golfers. We had poor choices for Captain’s picks, and the 9 qualifiers were not all playing their best. Still, even with the 12 best, there’s no guarantee of a US win. Just a better shot. If my math is correct, only one more US win each day would have made THE difference.
RI_Redneck
Sep 30, 2014 at 7:23 pm
I don’t believe there was anything wrong with the strategy. The problem is with the performance of the players in the clutch moments. I saw some poor decisions made on each day by guys that KNOW BETTER.I don’t think Tom was the problem. I think we need several match play events on the PGA tour.
BT
Woff
Sep 30, 2014 at 6:57 pm
Sad, a lesson here for all. Golf is the game for integredy and win loose that must be maintained for the sake of the game. Phil’s comments should have been left to the debrief not in the main stream media immediately after the flogging where passions were raw on both sides. If Tom won he was a genius, loose and he’s a demon. Both men had jobs to do and all players have to live with their individual performances personally as we all do who play the great game, and maybe if they looked at their own effort the “team” may owe Tom some sort of apology. Tom did not hit a ball guys.
8thehardway
Sep 30, 2014 at 6:47 pm
“Both sides did their best, but if my guys had shot a little straighter… ”
Gen. Custer’s graveside deconstruction of Little Big Horn
Al385
Sep 30, 2014 at 6:34 pm
This is the type of journalism I hate because it’s always looking for the yellowish side of the news. This is National Enquirer quality.
It could be Phil or anyone else. He was asked a question and he certainly answered the question about what happened in 2008 but the article only shows the twisted interpretation of the journalist.
Please, GolfWRX must have a higher quality. Guys, you can do it much better than this.
sqitis
Sep 30, 2014 at 6:30 pm
I really didn’t look at it as a bashing. Just a making a point and it’s ok to call someone out when they are wrong.
BondJamesBond
Sep 30, 2014 at 6:04 pm
Phil & Major Tom would both have liked to get us out of the current situation – both were (are) frustrated for different reasons. My Suspicion PM (~80% losing record) – Watson Pride of USA and waning ability to produce/perform on the grand stage that is Pro Golf.
Consider this from rydercup.com
Comparison of the United States and Europe Between 1985-2012
United Stat Europe
Wins 4 9
Tied 1 1
Matches won 155 188
Points won 184½ 207½
Foursome points won 53½ 58½
Four-ball points won 46½ 65½
Single points won 84½ 83½
Rookies record (US)72 wins, 84 losses, 27 halves
(EUR)54 wins, 58 losses, 30 halves
Captain’s Picks (US) 48 wins, 39 losses, 19 halves
(EUR) 59 wins, 52 losses, 12 halves
only categories we excel are singles (1 pt)& Captains picks. Period.
Interesting to note the no. or fewer Rooks they play in the matches, even this year with Victor it was controlled and planned to a tee (obv to me anyhow)
Anyone can run the nos. as I just did from rydercup.com site.
If it’s picks then the is the captain, can’t see this any other way.
Dennis Clark wrote an article yesterday which alluded to the population advantage of EUR vs. US. This is only inevitable – social economics to a certain degree (IMO) will sway the advantage to EUR.
New code required – does not include the PGA of America IMO but this will never happen because of the $ oppty they’d forgoe. Got to connect PGA of America with PGA TOUR and get mainstream with these top players else we’ll get more of the same.
I was front row at Kiawah on #18 when Langer missed the putt – best sporting event I’ve ever attended as a US fan – like nothing more than to see this again – BUT we’ve lost our way and must formulate an alternate strategy.
my 2 cents…
Shortgame85
Sep 30, 2014 at 5:54 pm
Ill timed questions by the media that are always to be expected. Their job is to provoke and stimulate the controversial copy that sells news and gossip rags. However, no matter how correct Phil may have been in the analysis in his response (and I think his analysis was correct), the timing of his response was poor. He could have chosen to give that response at a later time. Making those comments, he was sure to stimulate controversy, embarrass his team’s captain Tom Watson and provide additional coverage for himself. By his own admission, Phil is a very smart fellow, self aware of his comments and the effect they may have. I found the timing of his display of frustration, well founded as his frustration may be, to be in poor taste.
fastfde
Sep 30, 2014 at 5:51 pm
I’m not a Mickelson fan but, I for one am glad to see a PGA Pro give his honest opinion about anything including his assessment of Captain Watson’s performance. Why can anybody else voice their opinion (fans, media, etc) but not the person who was in the arena – at least he earned the right to voice his opinion. Perhaps some would rather his voice take a “Leave of Absence”.
Fred
Sep 30, 2014 at 7:10 pm
One thing is for certain; changes need to be made in order for the U.S. to become competitive in the Ryder Cup. If it takes Phil going public to create the momentum for these changes to occur, then so be it. The fact of the matter is, the system is broken. I think as the days go on, you will begin to hear other players echo those thoughts expressed by Mickelson. Face it, when half of the European Ryder Cup team couldn’t even make the cut at the FedEx Championship, which was won by am American, then there’s a serious problem that needs to be addressed. If the U.S. team wins the Cup two years from now, I wouldn’t think it too far fetched to say that we can thanks Phil Mickelson for speaking up.
Jason
Sep 30, 2014 at 4:23 pm
The captain certainly has something to do with how the team interacts, he can’t control the putts being made or missed but he has huge influence over team chemistry and it was clearly missing on the US side. Also don’t forget what a blow it was to the team not having Dustin Johnson and Jason Dufner in the mix.
jack from Omaha
Sep 30, 2014 at 5:37 pm
Rah, Rah for Phil.
Phil’s comments at the press conference were right on!!! He had the brilliance to stir debate so that just maybe we’ll take this thing seriously, and not just pick “a good ole boy” to be the next captain.
Dr. RosenRosen
Sep 30, 2014 at 3:59 pm
For those claiming that all blame should fall ONLY on the players, I ask why we have coaches in other sports? I would think that golf, moreso than almost any other sport given the importance of the mental game, would require a captain that is acutely attuned to the players’ strengths, attitudes, weaknesses, motivations, etc. A one-size fits all approach just doesn’t work.
I like Tom Watson. That being said, it appears he did little to foster a TEAM. And although I can’t believe I agree with Phil, it appears Watson also did little to bring out the best in each player. Instead, his mantra and instruction was simply “play better.”
No “great” coach – whether football, basketball, or little league baseball – would say his only job is picking the players for the team because “the players play.” The U.S. needs to think outside of the box and look for captains that are motivators and strategists, not just great former players.
kroner
Sep 30, 2014 at 3:27 pm
Herein lies the problem with the American team. It’s plainly obvious the Americans haven’t grasped the “team” concept. The accountablility on both the player’s and captain’s behalf were missing. Watson’s comments put the blame on the players, while a clearly frustrated Mickelson is looking towards his captain. This loss was a total team effort. Watson failed to put his players in situations they could play their best ie: Mickelson/Bradley over Spieth/Reed in Friday’s p.m. session and wearing out Fowler/Walker, while Mickelson’s Ryder Cup record does not befit a player of his caliber and seeing Back 9 leads evaporate from several players. Until the Americans check their egos and look in the mirror I’m afraid the infighting will keep Europe on top for many years to come.
Jeff B
Sep 30, 2014 at 3:08 pm
I agree, I didn’t find what he said distasteful or bashing anyone at all.
bm
Sep 30, 2014 at 2:35 pm
Phil will be captain some day (like Tiger if he really wants it) so he can do it his way at that time. As for the win by Azinger, I think I have to give Faldo credit too.
brian
Sep 30, 2014 at 1:55 pm
There was absolutely nothing wrong with the way Davis Love captained the Ryder Cup. In fact, he was up 10-6 going into Sunday that year. What was the excuse then for the singles matches? Davis Love didn’t hit a single shot, and he sure didn’t sit there and clap for Justin Rose as Rose was putting it to him.
Crenshaw won, but not because of anything he did with his pairings. It comes down to golf professionals hitting golf balls. There is no formula. It was quite simple to see this year that the best golfers hit the better shots.
gplfing
Sep 30, 2014 at 2:06 pm
This is a team game, and like your cells wandering around, to build
something (a win maybe!) a “team” structure is required by using a code….DNA.
Timbleking
Sep 30, 2014 at 1:43 pm
Sorry for you, fellow american competitors, but perhaps we could discuss about the way he said that, but he was right. Should we give Tom Watson the full respect he deserves for what he did as a player, he has been a real bad captain. There is a moment where USGA or whoever decides to whom they will grant the captaincy, has to understand that you need competencies in that role, and being a legend of the past in the game is not a guarantee for competencies as a captain. My 2 cents.
Robeli
Sep 30, 2014 at 4:06 pm
+1
tdbach
Oct 1, 2014 at 12:01 pm
Watson was the last captain to win the Cup on Euro soil. How did that happen?
ron
Sep 30, 2014 at 1:22 pm
I still don’t see what all this fuss over his comments is all about. It’s not like he called out Tom Watson specifically. He said the formula of 2008 (which happend to have given the US the win) was not copied in subsequest years…period. Watson did not coach every tean sisnce 2008. Yes it calls into qquestions selection process and strategy but this is being grossly sensationalized in my opinion.
Rich
Sep 30, 2014 at 7:42 pm
+1
gplfing
Sep 30, 2014 at 1:16 pm
For sure Phil is or has a ton of experience handling this pressers or tom´s, he would have is opinion, and as usual say nothing, but see the
situation he was on:
5 years ago the then young Hunter was crushed by it and until this day
he pays the price (just see the same shoot affected his head) until that
moment he gave all.
Again 5 years an Mr. Watson saying “some players just don’t deliver” WTF
is this…. Phil just stepped up.
ClubChump
Sep 30, 2014 at 1:05 pm
The captain doesn’t play! I can’t stress that enough. Pods’s or a group of 12 or whatever excuse you want to discuss the bottom line is the Americans lost. The Euro’s played better. If the USA wants to win the formula is simple. GET BETTER
Timbleking
Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 pm
And pay them…^^
Jeremy
Sep 30, 2014 at 2:32 pm
Couldn’t disagree more. These guys make plenty. The idea that they need to be paid a little more to bother competing in a competition that is one of the most exciting in the sport (when it’s not a blowout) is offensive.
Bluefan75
Oct 1, 2014 at 10:01 am
So everyone else should get to make a boatload off of them? Did you tune into see the players play, or to see Ted Bishop?
RobCH
Oct 2, 2014 at 11:42 am
Is your real name Tom Watson..?
Scooter McGavin
Sep 30, 2014 at 1:03 pm
Where was the “bashing” that was promised in the title? I read the whole transcript and found none.
Philip
Sep 30, 2014 at 3:47 pm
The title was the bashing.
Kevin
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:55 pm
The modern age of media, ask someone a question, go crazy when the response is not politically correct. And then the media wonders why athletes give vanilla cliches as answers over and over. The problem was that Tom Watson was not the right man for the job. The Europeans have great chemistry amongst themselves and with their captains. Phil was describing how Azinger better facilitated team chemistry. Tom Watson is old school, roll the ball out on the court and let them get after it. Could it have hurt Tom Watson’s feelings? Yes, but that team had lots of blame to go around for its failures.
by the way
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:26 pm
Listen again Ben. The question was directed to “Phil and anyone else who…” – Phil didn’t jump at anything.
Bob Tosh
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:45 pm
Exactly!!
Ben, why on earth would you go out of your way to Note: “(note: he jumped at the chance to answer a question posed to his entire team).”
when that is 100% clearly not accurate. Why would you deliberately not only leave that part out BUT add in your little “Note”?
That alone is what’s wrong with “journalism” today. Editing facts, to suit your own needs and agenda.
Crisis Calls
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:25 pm
McGinley’s strategy for dummies: Our 12 is better than theirs. No matter what happens, don’t give up or stop fighting. In the end, we (Europe) will prevail!
If US maintains a system which fails to identify best form, we will continue to lose. Look at the cards of our so-called top players. Cannot win if you cannot putt!
Ty
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:22 pm
Don’t see any controversy in Phil’s answer to the first question. It was a legit question, and regardless of whether Phil “jumped at the chance” to answer or not, it was an honest answer to a reasonable question. HOWEVER…the second question was easily as disrespectful to Tom Watson as Phil’s answer, and was, at least to me, an obvious attempt to bait Phil into saying something controversial. While I believe Phil could/should have paused and gone the route of a more respectful and thoughtful answer, anyone who follows golf knows that if you ask Phil a question, you’re going to get an answer that reflects what he honestly thinks, not necessarily an answer that is politically correct. In this case, Phil should have answered differently, but just as much so, the interviewer should have either phrased the second question differently or skipped it altogether.
As much to the point though, had the US team played better, we wouldn’t even be discussing this. One point total in 8 foursomes matches isn’t a reflection on anything the captain did…that’s on the players. I think it was Monty that on Sunday said if the US team were made up of 12 Patrick Reeds, they wouldn’t have been down 10-6. If that team was made up of players with as much fire and pride as Reed, what the captain did or didn’t do wouldn’t have mattered and we would be celebrating now instead of wondering what keeps going wrong.
Seth Mischke
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:21 pm
Plain and simple, if YOU as an athlete representing your country can’t get fired up and excited or “invested” on your own without the captain, vice captain, teammates, or mommy and daddy’s help then you shouldn’t fricking be on the team. Blows my mind! Tom wasn’t bashing anyone’s abilities, he was making decisions based on his experience and gut, right or wrong. He certainly didn’t coach the US to the loss, the thing was up for grabs until Saturday afternoon’s matches. The end point to all of this is play better than your opponent. Any twosome has a chance to beat any twosome during any format, these guys are all world class golfers and human.
Now, certainly there are things the US can do better, I do like Azinger’s business approach copy of the European process for Captains and Vice Captains. Consistency is usually a good thing in golf. Lick the wounds, move the frick on and do something about it.
RobCH
Oct 2, 2014 at 11:45 am
Coached a lot of elite athletes, have you?
West
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:18 pm
Europe cares more and wants to win more…at every level, from the captain, to the players.
Steve
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:09 pm
GOLF wrx – why is the text app so slow?
Greg Hunter
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:08 pm
I heard nothing wrong with what he said. Although it boils down to the players, you still need a strategy to put players in the best position to succeed
Crisis Calls
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:00 pm
Phil quickly placed blame for the loss on Watson, without mentioning his inferior play or that of the other US golfers. Such blame is what it is, an obfuscation of the truth: Players win or lose Ryder Cups, not captains!
Yoshida
Sep 30, 2014 at 2:36 pm
Absolutely False statement. Captains shape the team with picks, formats, course setup and team atmosphere. The problem doesn’t lie just in Watsons old school approach. The USA needs overhaul the way the Ryder Cup is approached and played. As Kurt Russell said in the movie Miracle, “gentleman, you do not have enough talent to win on talent alone.” USA no longer has the talent advantage once afforded in the past, the future rests in USA ability to adapt and change.
richard
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:57 am
I have loved Phil over the years, and although I may agree with most if not all of what he said, I do believe the comments were ill timed and inappropriate. Where were the congratulations to the Euros who had just stomped all over the Americans? Where was the respect for a captain with 8 major championships? All Phil did was decide to hammer home some points that he believes in without regard to the fallout or to the disrespect for Watson. Bad form Phil, should have let the dust settle for a while and tipped your hat to the Euros before going on the attack.
Brodie Hock
Sep 30, 2014 at 6:30 pm
+1
T-MAC
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:50 am
Once again, it’s the media trying to make a big deal out of nothing and/or start controversy. It’s what they do.
The American’s got out played. Could the US Team have made it closer if Watson would have made a few different choices? maybe. But the bottom line is, the US got outplayed. Period.
GolfIsHard
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:49 am
Phil could have made the same point just as effectively without being disrespectful to his Captain.
He also could have given the Europeans some credit for their Win, it’s not as much about what the Americans did wrong but about what Europe did right.
RobCH
Oct 2, 2014 at 11:47 am
He answered the question put to him, which referred back to 2008.
JoeC
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:45 am
It is amazing, really. The media and fans want athletes to be transparent and not give canned answers and then the media goes and blasts Phil for doing just that.
Don’t think for one minute that athletes everywhere don’t use this as a lesson. Sure, some will be open and honest but don’t expect those you pistol whip to give you any time.
Zak
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:06 pm
Agreed!!!! He answered the questions that were asked! He could have really roasted Watson if he wanted to and took the high road in my opinion.
Franksail
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:44 am
Good for Phil to express a counterpoint to Watsons position it is all about the players playing- lots of issues around why the US lost but lets move on – and while moving on lets get off the kick the Ryder Cup is “fashion week” in golf. Pods may not be the answer but red pants for sure don’t work let alone all the other non golf looking stuff these players had to wear. Watson – Polo great if your a horse but not so good if you actually play golf !
Steve
Sep 30, 2014 at 12:14 pm
Another Point. His POD was KIM and a few better players. I think the best team won this last week. Sorry – just my opinion.
It does also matter that Dustin Johnson surely would have been on the team and Keegan Not. Keegan was a bad PICK. Interesting to find out who PHIL would have PICKED if he were in Watson’s position. He would have to do what is best. I wonder if the chance is coming closer to a Player Captain. I think that is best. If the Captain is also competing he will then have 4 vice Captains playing with him and making team decisions.
Watson is right – he has a different Management Style. The styles have definitely changed after 2008 with what Azinger did with the team. Azinger is one of my favorite players of all time regardless of his Ryder Cup experience. The fact that he has holed Bunker shots to win championships makes him a really strong Player when it is clutch time. I think that helps in identifying the traits and abilities that work best in Match Play.
Don
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:40 am
I wonder about Azinger’s winning formula for Ryder Cup. Sometimes it is not a case of winning as it is a case of losing. So far I have not heard much regarding Faldo’s losing formula. Given his comments regarding Garcia I am wondering what the members of that team thought of him?
Mike Belkin
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:11 am
I absolutely love the fact that Phil just says things how they are. I feel the same way about Rory and his honest answers of questions too.
Philip
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:07 am
This is crazy. Talk about making sh$t out of nothing. He was asked a very specific question which he answered quite clearly and related it to the last three Ryder Cups of which Tom Watson had nothing to do with two of them.
What was out of line and amounting to bashing was the response
“Q. That felt like a pretty brutal destruction of the leadership that’s gone on this week.”
which is a poor attempt of sensationalizing to create hearsay, and unfortunately it apparently worked. It is like everyone is on edge hoping for crap like this.
He talked about 2008 not Tom Watson.
Philip
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:08 am
Four Ryder Cups of which Tom Watson had nothing to do with three of them.
kloyd0306
Sep 30, 2014 at 9:40 pm
You’ve nailed it!
Phil’s refreshing honesty criticized the 2010, 2012 and 2014 failures.
As usual, the press needs a story and often makes more of a statement than is necessary – just to justify their existence.
Not being able to include two or three hot players (Hoershel, Kirk and Todd) harmed their effort. The rookies (Speith, Walker and Reed) showed what passion was missing.
Simpson was a poor choice, as was Bradley. Bubba is not tough enough for this stuff.
Tom Watson showed he is out of touch, especially after standing down the Reed/Speith partnership for the alternate shot format on day one.
RobCH
Oct 2, 2014 at 11:50 am
I agree. However, I don’t believe any captain would have gone with six rookies.
John Flavia
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:05 am
Here’s a transcript of what Phil said below. Seems like the guy asking questions tried to frame it in a way with question #2, in making this into a controversy by inserting “brutal destruction of the leadership this week” that was carried by everyone else afterwards to direct heat on Phil for his comments.
Imagine if the scribe asking the questions said “Phil felt an alternative approach may have worked better (which is exactly what he described)”, do you think there would have been the same backlash? Colin, Nick, Chamblee, etc., all quick to jump on Phil because the scribe said “brutal destruction of the leadership this week” and it was continued as “Phil taking shots at Tom Watson”. All it takes is one guy to describe it one way or another (‘attack’ vs. suggesting different approach) for everyone else to hop on the bandwagon….they all took the bait.
————————–
Q. Anyone that was on the team at Valhalla, can you put your finger on what worked in 2008 and what hasn’t worked since?
PHIL MICKELSON: There were two things that allow us to play our best I think that Paul Azinger did, and one was he got everybody invested in the process. He got everybody invested in who they were going to play with, who the picks were going to be, who was going to be in their pod, who — when they would play, and they had a great leader for each pod. In my case, we had Ray Floyd, and we hung out together and we were all invested in each other’s play. We were invested in picking Hunter that week; Anthony Kim and myself and Justin were in a pod, and we were involved on having Hunter be our guy to fill our pod. So we were invested in the process. And the other thing that Paul did really well was he had a great game plan for us, you know, how we were going to go about doing this. How we were going to go about playing together; golf ball, format, what we were going to do, if so-and-so is playing well, if so-and-so is not playing well, we had a real game plan. Those two things helped us bring out our best golf. And I think that, you know, we all do the best that we can and we’re all trying our hardest, and I’m just looking back at what gave us the most success. Because we use that same process in The Presidents Cup and we do really well. Unfortunately, we have strayed from a winning formula in 2008 for the last three Ryder Cups, and we need to consider maybe getting back to that formula that helped us play our best.
Q. That felt like a pretty brutal destruction of the leadership that’s gone on this week.
PHIL MICKELSON: Oh, I’m sorry you’re taking it that way. I’m just talking about what Paul Azinger did to help us play our best. It’s certainly — I don’t understand why you would take it that way. You asked me what I thought we should do going toward to bring our best golf out and I go back to when we played our best golf and try to replicate that formula.
Q. That didn’t happen this week?
PHIL MICKELSON: Uh (pausing) no. No, nobody here was in any decision. So, no.
Philip
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:24 am
Unfortunately it appears that a large portion of the world has forgotten or never learned how to read. It has never been easier to manipulate “fools” people.
Disappointed reader
Sep 30, 2014 at 3:03 pm
The thing that is more disturbing is complete lack of writing ability by everyone covering this non-story. He was asked a specific question and he answered it. Phil was not rude and did not bash anyone. This article is embarrassing. It is all about the clicks for pennies.
RyderFan
Oct 1, 2014 at 12:01 pm
Tough to give any credibility to a writer when you spend 30 seconds trying to figure out what a “lede” is.
Desmond
Sep 30, 2014 at 3:01 pm
I’m okay with most of Phil’s comments. When the reporter asked whether “that” happened this week, he should have bowed out by saying “Our Captain took a different approach this week, and that is all I want to say.”
I think it took leadership for Phil to speak up, and leadership is not always pretty … mistakes are made because we’re human. But Phil opened the doors to a full discussion.
Watson named a team but he did not form a team.
You do not take 12 millionaires with similar skills and talents, and as Captain, tell them what to do. The Captain is himself a colleague. In this instance, a participatory leadership style is necessary.
Watson’s dictatorial style works with 14 yr olds, the military, and in emergencies, but not in the Ryder Cup.
ams165
Sep 30, 2014 at 10:58 am
USA got outplayed by the Euro’s.
In my opinion it has nothing to do with the Captain.
This is professional golf not tee ball.
The US crybabies are trying to find someone to blame and that person is Billy Martin, I mean Tom Watson.
So with that logic all the missed 2-4 footers and bad shots were Tom Watson fault???
I call shenanigans.
Sorry Team Phil your reaching.
Yoshida
Sep 30, 2014 at 2:03 pm
This has absolutely everything to do with the captain. Tom Watson played in an era where USA players were so far superior that Captaincy was an honorary position and playing the hot players were all that was needed to win. Europe is far more competive the last 15 years and if the USA is going to be competitive a complete overhaul of the way the Ryder Cup is approached, players are selected, and players are paired together. Azingers approach was a step in the right direction but after watching the foursomes matches the USA clearly did not have the right players for this format. USA needs a “moneyball” approach. Maybe more captains picks so the RIGHT players are on the team, not the best according to the world ranking. Herb Brooks approach to the 1980 Olympics for USA hockey was nearly 25 years ago and USA golf has still not embraced that lesson for the Ryder Cup. I’m not saying the USA will never lose if the process is overhauled because Europe played great, I’m saying the USA will never have a chance to win.
ada
Oct 6, 2014 at 11:38 am
Maybe the Euros are just better players. They’ve got 4 of the last 5 US Open champions, plus a recent Fedex Cup winner (Stenson), a Ryder Cup stud in Poulter, and world #3. How are you gonna’ beat that, even if you had a hot Horschel and Kirk?
Let’s face it: Europe’s best golfers are better than America’s best.
Captain Obvious
Sep 30, 2014 at 10:56 am
Needed to be said, maybe not the appropriate time, but something has got to change in the picking of captains and players. The captains are not playing, but they have to get the players fired up and involved in the Ryder Cup. The players have got to have heart and want to play. Europe has had the right formula for a while and the US has got to get it. Europe has just played better.
Matt
Sep 30, 2014 at 10:41 am
I have no problem with his comments. He answered a direct question with his opinion, and let’s be honest, got the much needed discussion started on how to change our Ryder Cup strategy.
Tom Watson is a golf legend. Phil’s comments, nor Watson’s poor performance at Gleneagles, could ever change that.
BigBoy
Sep 30, 2014 at 10:38 am
So he spoke the truth, you americans don’t like the truth????
Dpavs
Sep 30, 2014 at 11:48 am
Most of us do, but the media here like abroad loves to twist things and there will always be a certain percentage of people who will bite on that kind of bait.
dtkb82
Sep 30, 2014 at 4:49 pm
doesn’t mean you have to go public with your comments. Win as 12 lose as 12.
When you win say very little. When you lose say even less
Joe duffer
Sep 30, 2014 at 10:49 pm
“doesn’t mean you have to go public with your comments. Win as 12 lose as 12.
When you win say very little. When you lose say even less”
This is the best post of all of them! That is exactly what should have taken place shut up and go home and maybe give the Euros the congrats they deserved!
Dpavs
Oct 1, 2014 at 7:50 am
When things need to change do you really think putting your head in the sand and ignoring what you feel is wrong helps anything?
Besides he was asked point blank what he thought and he gave an honest answer… and in doing so he indicated what he felt was right about the 2008 cup team and what he felt has been missing ever since. If someone takes that personally perhaps that says more about them than it does about Phil.