Opinion & Analysis
Four key factors for success on the PGA Tour
It is a common practice in statistical analysis to seek out commonalities for successful or unsuccessful relationships in order to more accurately forecast future events. For example, if I own a store known for selling lemonade, I may want to find out certain commonalities between the days I tend to sell more lemonade versus the days I sell less lemonade. Those commonalities may be the temperature, tourist events that are in town, holidays and weekends versus weekdays.
Generally, the fewer the commonalities the more likely it will lead to a more accurate forecast. If I know that my store is largely dependent on the weather in order to sell lemonade and the other factors are negligible, then it becomes easier to plan around the weather variable. If I know that the warmer the temperature the more lemonade I can sell, I can then stock up on lemonade and perhaps up the price during the summer versus stocking less lemonade and discounting the lemonade during the winter.
With golf, I find many golfers attempt to break down the game in the same fashion. The old drive for show and putt for dough adage is quite common. There is also the various groups of people that believe that wedge play is everything, or hitting it long is everything, or hitting fairways is everything or even the doing everything well is everything.
What I have found in my research on the PGA Tour is common sense, but not entirely obvious. In essence, in order to be VERY successful on the PGA Tour, a golfer does not have to be great at everything. In fact, they do not even have be great at anything. Instead, if they are at least at the average in four different parts of the game, they are extremely likely to be very successful on Tour. In my 2012 Pro Golf Synopsis, I called these “The Big Four” of golf. I have since altered this slightly to derive an even more accurate depiction of how to be successful on Tour.
Driving Effectiveness
I utilize a proprietary algorithm that depicts how effective a golfer on Tour was off the tee. This algorithm includes metrics that are part of three different components to driving the ball: power, accuracy and precision.
The precision metrics have the greatest influence on a golfer’s score. This is followed by the power metric and then the accuracy metric. Average Distance to the Edge of the Fairway is based on shots that miss the fairway. Missed Fairway – Other % is any time a tee shot ends up in a hazard or requires a subsequent “rescue shot.”
Morgan Hoffmann, who finished 111th on Tour in 2013, was at “the average” for Driving Effectiveness on Tour. Here are a look at his metrics:
As we can see, Hoffmann hit it very long off the tee (Distance is based on all drives measured with a laser). He wasn’t very accurate, but his precision metrics were pretty good.
“Danger Zone” play
Danger Zone play is shots from 175-to-225 yards. This part of the game has the strongest correlation to success on Tour. All things being equal, I have determined that the difference between the best on Tour from the Danger Zone versus the Tour average is worth roughly 0.4 to 0.45 strokes per round. That may not seem like much, but it could be the difference between 40 to 60 spots on the money list.
Kevin Chappell, who finished 58th on Tour in 2013, was at the average from the Danger Zone, hitting those shots an average of 42 feet to the cup.
Short game shots from 10-to-20 yards
What I have found with my research is that the short game shots that have a mathematical correlation to Adjusted Scoring Average on Tour are from within 20 yards to the edge of the green. Outside of 20 yards, the correlation regresses. I believe that many shots from longer than 20 yards come down to luck and randomness.
What I have also found is shots from 20-to-100 yards are incredibly unimportant to the success on Tour. However, the common fallacy with some stat heads is that they start to label shots from less than 20 yards and putting in with shots from 20-to-100 yards, and thus they start to label putting as unimportant as well. The truth is that putting is very important as well as short game shots from under 20 yards. But when you add shots from 20-to-100 yards into the mix, it inaccurately waters down the importance of the short game and putting.
In 2012 Pro Golf Synopsis, I labeled this component of The Big Four as “total short game.” However, it is clear that when it comes to the short game, shots from 10-to-20 yards are much more important than shots from 1-to-10 yards. Thus, I decided to add only shots from 10-to-20 yards in The Big Four metrics that matter on Tour.
Long-hitting Luke List, who finished 163 on Tour in 2013, was at the Tour average at hitting shots from 10-to-20 yards to 6.7 feet.
Strokes Gained-Putting
The last metric is pretty self-explanatory. Typically, the golfers who perform best in Strokes Gained-Putting are the ones who make a higher percentage of putts from 3-to-15 feet than the others. Putts outside of 15 feet start to come down to randomness and luck.
So, who were the players that finished in the top-half in each of these metrics in 2013?
Seven out of the nine players listed finished in the top-25 on the 2013 money list. Jerry Kelly finished 99th, but that was mostly due to him playing in events with lower purse sizes. Meanwhile, he ranked No. 47 in Adjusted Scoring Average, the metric that most accurately depicts a player’s performance.
While it certainly does not hurt the cause, success on Tour is not about being great at anything (by Tour standards). Success on Tour is about being better than the average at a few important parts of the game. If a player is at least average or better off the tee, on the green, from 175-to-225 yards and from 10-to-20 yards they have put themselves in position to be wildly successful.
Club Junkie
Tour Edge Exotics mini driver review + TaylorMade Spider ZT Max first look – Club Junkie
On this episode of Club Junkie, I put the new Tour Edge Exotics Mini Driver to the test and break down the performance, forgiveness, distance, and where it fits compared to a traditional driver or strong fairway wood. If you have been curious about adding a mini driver to the bag, this one is worth a look.
I also dive into the new TaylorMade Spider ZT Max putter that was recently spotted and discuss the growing zero torque putter trend. Plus, there is a closer look at the new Project X Titan Yellow shaft showing up on the PGA Tour and what makes it different from other profiles currently out there.
Opinion & Analysis
AVL: We’re talking about practice! My best tips for taking your game to the course
With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game.
Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills.
While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice.
This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times.
Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy.
One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length. Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine.
It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season.
Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds.
Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time. With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game. Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills. While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice. This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times. Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy. One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length.
Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine. It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season. Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds. Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time.
Equipment
Seoul Sensibilities: Is Korean golf fashion starting to shape the world?
For Korean golfers, we always look forward to the last of the kkot-saem-chu-I for the true start of a new golf season. The term refers to a cold snap, but literally translates as “winter being jealous of the flowers beginning to bloom, thus lashing out one final time before surrendering to spring”.
A rather poetic mouthful packed into a short expression.
Koreans can be like that. Understated, yet oddly expressive at the same time. And nowhere is this more true on the golf course and in our golf bags. In fact, I suspect many Korean golfers look forward to new apparel and accessory drops more than they do actual equipment launches each year.

At this point, Korean golf fashion may exist on its own timeline. (courtesy of @seonbi_golfer)
There is ample evidence to support that suspicion. Korea is the world’s third-largest golf market behind the United States and Japan, yet its appetite for golf apparel exceeds that of both countries combined. Recent estimates suggest that Korea accounts for nearly 40 percent of the global golf apparel market, placing it among the world’s most influential golf fashion markets and punching well above its size.
Simply, we care deeply about how new golf clubs look and feel, but enjoy looking good while swinging them even more.
Golfers in the West may laugh and say that golf is played on a course, not a fashion runway. Perhaps. But what’s the harm in trying to look and feel good, if the added self-confidence can help actual performance? It certainly seems to have worked for Jason Day, who may have unlocked a new stats category: dormant strokes gained. Coincidence?

During the COVID-era, estimates placed the market near $9 billion, an astonishing figure for a single country.
As a proud member of Gen X, I’ve witnessed the highs and lows of golf fashion firsthand. The pleated trousers and wing-tipped shoes of Jack Nicklaus, the stylish plus-fours and knickers of Payne Stewart, the baggy black trousers and fitted mock-necks of Tiger Woods, and the thigh-hugging athletic tailoring of Rory McIlroy. Golf fashion, like the golf swing itself, has rarely stood still.
But nowhere have those trends shifted, evolved, and been scrutinized quite as relentlessly as in Korea. Here, golf fashion moves faster than fairway gossip, and consumers dissect brands with a level of discernment that can be both impressive and mildly terrifying. New brands are studied, judged, embraced, or dismissed with startling efficiency.
The result is a consumer base with one of the sharpest eyes for quality and authenticity anywhere in the world. It is difficult to quantify, but easy to recognize. Clean lines without trying too hard. Luxury mixed with utility. Trend awareness balanced by restraint and purpose.
It’s golf fashion shaped by one of the world’s most style-literate cities, something I like to call Seoul Sensibilities, referring to the taste level forged by a uniquely competitive environment.
And increasingly, global brands have noticed.

Many golf brands in Korea have their own flagship shops dedicated to apparel only
Titleist understood this years ago, when its apparel business in Korea took on a life of its own under new ownership and local direction. What had once been a straightforward extension of an iconic equipment giant became something sharper and more premium. By going all in on the serious Tour-player look (I couldn’t even fit into their XL sizes), Titleist struck the right chord with Korean consumers and helped its fledgling apparel business break into the mainstream. Titleist became a household name even for non-golfers who wore its caps, shirts, and windbreakers in daily life. In many ways, it proved that even heritage golf brands could carry real fashion credibility when viewed through a Korean lens.
Several years later, PXG took a page out of Titleist’s playbook and followed suit. Korean consumers helped transform the brand from one known largely for irons and loud commercials into something broader and more stylish. PXG apparel’s growth in Korea was explosive, where it found an early audience and turned the category into something more than mere logo merchandise. It is still hard to walk anywhere in Seoul without seeing its palindrome logo.
Malbon’s meteoric rise in the United States was genuine, but its ascent into a global golf lifestyle brand owes much to Korea, where it was elevated by a market already fluent in modern golf style. Korea did not simply embrace Malbon. It pressure-tested the concept, refined its appeal, and helped push it into the global spotlight.
As such, new brands may arrive from abroad, but more often than not, their sharpest evolution happens here. If a brand can earn credibility in Seoul, it’s deemed to have passed one of the toughest style audits in the game.
That is why the next meaningful chapter may not come from outside, but from a Korean brand moving in the opposite direction, carrying those Seoul Sensibilities outward as K-pop once did.

Play young Stay dope.
From Seoul, With Intent
Khalhon is a label that feels less like a trend-chasing newcomer and more like the product of a market that has already seen everything. Golfers here have long been surrounded by luxury logos, technical fabrics, and tour uniforms disguised as lifestyle wear and vice-versa. In other words, novelty alone rarely lasts here, and the Koreans seems to understand that instinctively.
Its style language leans into clean silhouettes, relaxed but tailored proportions, muted palettes, and premium materials that speak quietly but confidently. There is a modern city aesthetic running through it all, with strong layering pieces, thoughtful textures, and subtle branding that suggests sophistication rather than demanding attention.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
Most importantly, the garments seem designed to blur the line between golfwear and everyday style. Shirts, trousers, knitwear, and outer layers move comfortably between a game of screen golf, a lunch reservation, an airport gate, or an afternoon coffee in Gangnam with friends.
It raises the question of whether this is golfwear that happens to look good off the course, or everyday clothing that performs beautifully on the fairways.
Personally, I have long appreciated Nike Golf for its clean, athletic modernization of golf attire. It also has the useful side effect of making me look like a more serious golfer than I probably am. But off the course, there are times when being instantly identified as the golf guy in a crowd of non-golfers can feel a touch self-conscious.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
That is part of what drew me to Khalhon, which seemed to blend golf and everyday wear naturally. While some of the outfits may be slightly beyond my personal confidence level, the brand also offers tasteful options for older guys like me who still want to express a little personality without regretting the decision later.
These are not simply flashy outfits worn on the course and then banished to the closet until the next tee time. They work surprisingly well off the course too, and I suspect many of the pieces will still look right a couple of years from now, which would certainly be kinder to my wallet than most golf fashion trends tend to be.
And perhaps that broader lifestyle positioning also helps explain why someone like Sean Wotherspoon would find Khalhon creatively interesting in the first place.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
“Korea is not only one of the most fashion-forward golf markets in the world, but one of the most fashion-forward markets globally. Korea is ahead, and I love to watch and try to catch up.” – Sean Wotherspoon, Creative Director at Khalhon
Seoul and Beyond
If Khalhon’s rise says something about where Korean golf fashion is today, its relationship with Sean Wotherspoon says even more about where it is heading.
For readers less familiar with Sean Wotherspoon, his arrival at Khalhon is not some routine celebrity endorsement or influencer collaboration. In design and streetwear circles, Wotherspoon is regarded as one of the more influential creative voices of his generation, particularly when it comes to blending nostalgia, storytelling, and contemporary culture into products that people can connect with.
He first gained widespread attention through his now-famous Nike sneaker collaborations, where his vintage-inspired designs and instinct for color helped turn him into one of the defining artists of the late-2010s sneaker era. His work gradually expanded beyond footwear into apparel, automotive collaborations, collectibles, and broader lifestyle design.
Modern golf style now extends well beyond the fairways, where performance and functionality are largely expected by default. And while plenty of brands already make technically competent golfwear, Khalhon seems more focused on designing clothes people would genuinely want to wear even after the round ends.
And when guys at Wotherspoon’s level show genuine interest in working with a Korean golf brand as its new Creative Director, fashion circles tend to sit up and pay attention. There’s already a huge buzz among the fashion-conscious here about upcoming collabs with iconic sports stars and brands.

“My creative direction for Khalhon is disruptive, colorful, nostalgic, and modern. My goal is to blend these avenues seamlessly within each collection.” – Sean Wotherspoon
In chatting with Sean, what stood out most to me was how genuinely energized he sounded about the project itself. Despite having already worked across and countless other creative spaces, he described golf as a completely fresh category for him, saying that Khalhon “will be an amazing vehicle for my design work.”
At the same time, his enthusiasm seemed tied just as much to Korea itself. He spoke openly about admiring Korea’s fashion culture while repeatedly insisting he is still a terrible golfer.
There was something oddly refreshing about that humility. Rather than sounding like a celebrity parachuting into golf simply because the category suddenly became fashionable, Sean sounded genuinely curious about what Korea might do with the category next.
And perhaps that is what makes Khalhon feel interesting right now. The brand feels less like a trend-chaser and more like the natural result of a market now confident enough to export its own point of view.
For years, global brands came to Korea to sharpen their image against one of the most discerning audiences anywhere. Now, a Korean label appears ready to send those Seoul Sensibilities outward instead.
Which brings us back to kkot-saem-chu-i.
That final cold snap before spring always arrives with a reminder that seasons are changing, whether we notice it immediately or not. Golf fashion feels a little like that right now as well, as the old boundaries between sport, streetwear, luxury, and everyday style continue to soften.
And somewhere in Seoul, a Korean golf label already seems prepared for whatever season comes next. I just hope they have everything in my size.




Pingback: What Rickie Fowler Must Do to Join the ‘Big 3′ in Golf’s Elite Class | Sports News
Pingback: What Rickie Fowler Must Do to Join the ‘Big 3’ in Golf’s Elite Class | My Blog
Pingback: 10 Players Who Will Rise (or Fall) in 2015 | Golf Gear Select
Pingback: 10 Players Who Will Rise (or Fall) in 2015 | GolfClick.net | Blog
tbaxxtbaxx
Apr 26, 2014 at 12:27 am
Nice article Rich. My question is, what single statistic has the highest correlation with money won? Ballstriking composite? Putting? Scrambling? GIR?
Brock
Nov 8, 2013 at 4:01 pm
Why does the danger zone correspond to a higher delta in shots per round (.4 to .45 as you said) than say, 125-150, or 150-175? It seems like the majority of their approach shots these days are inside 175. So, I wouldn’t think that’s the reason for the importance. Is it because the range of misses are bigger from that distance than they would be from 125-175, leading to magnified scores down the line?
TK
Oct 25, 2013 at 3:07 am
Great article Richie, very interesting.
So in terms of the pga tour by your calculation of stats you believe that short game shots from 10-20 yards are much more important than from 20-100?
But I guess it is determined on how short or long the course is?
KCCO
Oct 23, 2013 at 10:39 pm
Best piece I’ve read in a bit on here, thx for very useful info!
Andrew Cooper
Oct 22, 2013 at 10:27 am
Thanks Richie, great stuff. Would you say this big 4 would also apply for club golfers? Does it change as you move through different handicap levels?
Richie Hunt
Oct 24, 2013 at 12:03 pm
Every part of the game is important to some level. If a golfer can improve their fairway bunker play, over time it will help their score. It’s just not going to be as important as something like putting. For club golfers, the Zone ranges differ because they play shorter courses. You can get a good idea of your Danger Zone by looking at the average distance of the par-3’s. And for amateurs, driving becomes the most important part of the game. That is where the greatest standard deviation exists for amateurs. If they can have a good day driving the ball, it will help their score the most. Other than that, I would stick to the Big Four (driving, putting, short game and long approach shots).
paul
Oct 21, 2013 at 9:37 pm
Im glad i am not the only one that thinks that golf numbers are fascinating. All my friends think i am a big golf nerd cause i hit a measured and controlled distance off the tee so i have to hit a pitching wedge for my second shot. of course i beat them so i am an even bigger geek. I thought i was just doing good course management 🙁
[email protected]
Oct 23, 2013 at 8:29 am
Reminds me of how Greg Norman defined aggressive play. If a strength of your game is that wedge then getting that wedge in your hand as many times as possible is Aggressive! Good for you !
Golfwrx
Oct 21, 2013 at 8:39 pm
The successful formula: Know How to Close the Tournament. Numbers don’t mean anything if a PGA Tour player can’t close the deal.
Richie Hunt
Oct 22, 2013 at 9:55 am
Looking at Tour player performance, it’s very much a roller coaster ride throughout the year. Every player gets hot by their standards and then cools down and then plays decent. Part of the problem for Tour players is that the most they will get hot for is 3 weeks in a row. Rarely do I see a player get hot for 4 weeks in a row. They will get hot for 3 weeks in a row and then cool right down.
What separates the great Tour players from the rest is that when they are ‘cold’, they can still make cuts. When they are so-so, they are making the top-25. And when they are hot, they are in the top-5.
The problem for them here is that they can’t rely on great putting. It just doesn’t happen week to week. But if they can consistently be average or better in these four areas from week-to-week, they can start making cuts on their down tournaments, making top-25’s when they play so-so, and finish in the top-5 when they are playing well. And the more times they can get into the top-5, they will increase their chances of getting that victory.
Vlad
Oct 22, 2013 at 11:05 am
Streakiness, or being hot/cold for X weeks at a time, is something that doesn’t get talked about much. Interesting to hear the pros “…can’t rely on great putting. It just doesn’t happen week to week.”
Cyclical performance has a good bit of relevance to the amatuer/casual golfers. For me, when one area (like driver) gets hot, another area (like putting) cools down. Is this the same phenomenon with the pros? When they are in a stretch of being on the leaderboard week after week, is it that all facets are clicking? Or is it a case of 2 or 3 out of 4 areas (tee, approach, short game, putting) are exceptionally good?
Finnegans
Oct 21, 2013 at 8:18 pm
Great article again!
Thanx
Richie Hunt
Oct 21, 2013 at 6:35 pm
Thanks for the kind words.
A J
Oct 21, 2013 at 4:59 pm
The most original, insightful golf writer on the planet?
That would be Rich Hunt.
Another absolutely brilliant article. Thank you.