Equipment
When it comes to golf club design, to copy is to create
If you have roamed the forums of GolfWRX and read a post about any non-Ping milled putter, you have most assuredly read the phrase, “Oh, you mean…nice Ping Anser!”
In fact, it’s usually a race to see who posts it first!
Needless to say, it’s a very worn out phrase and warrants a need for GolfWRX forums to incorporate a text recognition protocol to automatically inhibit that combination of words from being posted again. I digress…
Certainly, Karsten deserves praise for his ingenuity and eternal influence on the game of golf and the equipment used to play it. Widely considered the inventor of perimeter weighted golf clubs, Karsten is responsible for such greats as the 1959 Ping A-1, the 1966 Anser, and the first cavity back irons, the Ping 69.
But, was he really the first to develop a perimeter-weighted golf club? No.
Copying is an essential part of creation. It’s also a very natural process; in fact, it’s exactly what us humans are, a multitude of cells that have been copied, split and multiplied. So as we look for inspiration, we look to what’s already been made and seek ways to improve upon it.
Henry Ford said it best
“I invented nothing new. I simply assembled the discoveries of other men behind whom were centuries of work. Had I worked fifty or ten or even five years before, I would have failed. So it is with every new thing. Progress happens when all the factors that make for it are ready, and then it is inevitable. To teach that a comparatively few men are responsible for the greatest forward steps of mankind is the worst sort of nonsense.”
As we look at the historic design of the 1966 Ping Anser, we see an interesting correlation to putters that came before it. The idea of perimeter weighting a putter didn’t start with the Anser, nor did it start with the A1. I believe it successfully started with the John Reuter, Jr. Bullseye design and the John Letters Golden Goose putters. (Ryan Barath of GolfWRX, recently produced a short video on the Bullseye answering the question, “Why was it great?”)
The Bullseye and the Golden Goose putters were separately introduced to the U.S. and British golf markets in the mid-1940s. This unique scenario is commonly referred to as “multiple discovery,” where the same innovation emerges from different places at or near the same time. Since Karsten was based in the U.S., the Bullseye is the most likely influencer.
At the time of the Bullseye’s creation, center-shafted putters were illegal, but Reuter believed he could create a more stable putter by placing the shaft as close to the center as possible and leave a small protruding heel opposite the toe, thus bringing more balance to the putter.
Karsten certainly was aware of the Bullseye design, as was the entire golfing world. In my opinion, Karsten made strong improvements to its design by creating the A-1, a remarkably similar design and even a material look, further exaggerating the principles of perimeter weighting by removing weight from the center of the putter and placing it in the heel, toe, and sole of the putter head. It also could be considered the father to many of the center-shafted SeeMore putters used today. The innovation of the A-1 thus led the way for the historic Ping Anser, another variation of a close-to-center-shafted putter with weight removed from the center and redistributed to the heel and toe.
The fact of the matter is, Karsten did not invent perimeter weighting, but he was the one who exploited its benefits, pushed the technology to the limit, and made it look really cool in the process. The most unique aspects to the Anser design was the flat flange in the middle, allowing alignment aids to be added, and the plumbers neck, which allowed the axis of the shaft to pass close to center without actually doing it, further allowing the face of the putter at address to be visible.
Having the visionary ability to see something and make it better is the trademark of a great inventor. It’s worth noting some of the other major innovations that lead the way for John Reuter, Jr’s and Karsten’s inspiration.
- In 1919, W. F. Fitz Maurice patented the idea of attaching weight to a golf club to increase the swing weight, what we would consider today as lead tape.
- Then in 1930, E. E. Tucker patented the idea of the first adjustable driver and putter, allowing the use of weighted screws to be added to the toe and heel of a putter, or the back of the driver.
- In 1961, D. Rains Et Al, who patented the changeable weight putter, allowing for the adjustment of the putter’s head weight with a removable solid bar that passed through the center.
Not all inspiration needs to come from golf either. Just this year, Mizuno released the T20 wedges and used the inspiration of a much more common item, tire tread. Tire tread allows water to be dispersed in different directions upon contact and improve grip. Mizuno engineers used this idea and made micro-grooves that are placed in a perpendicular format to the main grooves, to direct water away, thereby improving clubface contact in wet conditions and maintaining more spin than a wedge without it.
Many forward-thinking engineers lead the way and prepared the environment for all of the advancements that we use today. While we often point to one individual being responsible for some breakthrough golf technology, it should be remembered that the innovations of today are almost always inspired by the innovations of our predecessors.
Equipment
Neal Shipley, AKA, the “Big Fridge’s,” custom stamping
Neal Shipley was the first to admit that he enjoyed his food while in college. But since his days at Ohio State, he’s slimmed down and earned a PGA Tour Card.
That hasn’t stopped him from having fun with his wedge stampings, though it’s led to some misunderstandings.
On the 54 (degree), we have ‘Big Fudge,'” Shipley told GolfWRX. “It was supposed to be ‘Big Fridge,’ so this happened a little while ago. ‘Big Fridge’ was a nickname between my college teammates and I, with ‘fridge’ meaning stomach, a big stomach.

“We told the Ping guys to put … ‘Big Fridge’ on it, and I think maybe some bad cell service or something, and they thought I said ‘fudge,’ so they put fudge on it.”
On Shipley’s 50-degree he also continues the food theme, this time with his go-to order at the “Golden Arches,” and his stamping “DONS 7.”
“The number 7 meal, the two cheeseburger meal, that was my McDonald’s order, back when I would have McDonald’s frequently,” Shipley shared.
Equipment
From the GolfWRX Classifieds: L.A.B. Purple DF3 with Masters cover
At GolfWRX, we are a community of like-minded individuals who all experience and express our enjoyment of the game in many ways.
It’s that sense of community that drives day-to-day interactions in the forums on topics that range from best driver to what marker you use to mark your ball. It even allows us to share another thing we all love – buying and selling equipment.
Currently, in our GolfWRX buy/sell/trade (BST) forum, @raw10628 has a L.A.B. DF3 putter and Masters putter cover up for grabs.

From the listing: “Some great items here today, time to thin out and make room for next set of gear. All prices include shipping.
LAB DF3 Purple 33.5” 68° lie with TPT – $725. LAB Masters release DF3 cover – $150.”
To check out the full listing in our BST forum, head through the link. If you are curious about the rules to participate in the BST Forum, you can learn more here: GolfWRX BST Rules
Whats in the Bag
Maria Torres WITB 2026 (June)
Driver: Ping G440 LST (9 degrees)
Shaft: Accra TourZ Green 5-M4

3-wood: Ping G440 Max (15 degrees)
Shaft: Accra TourZ Green 6-M4

5-wood: Ping G440 Max (19 degrees @18)
Shaft: Accra TourZ Green 6-M4

Hybrid: Ping G440 (23 degrees)
Shaft: Oban Isawa Red Hybrid Shaft 04 Flex 70 Gms

Irons: Srixon ZXi7 (5-P)
Shafts: Aerotech SteelFiber Private Reserve i80

Wedges: Cleveland RTZ (50-MID, 54-FULL, 58-MID)
Shafts: Aerotech SteelFiber Private Reserve i105

Putter: L.A.B. Golf OZ.1i
Shaft: ACCRA Putter Shaft

Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet



JP
Oct 2, 2019 at 10:47 am
Is this written in defense of scotty cameron?
Adam
Oct 2, 2019 at 10:06 am
This article seems very unnecessary. Copying is not creating, that is objective, in fact it’s the opposite. The problem is some manufacturers will blatantly copy and not cite inspiration. Having said that I don’t feel club most manufacturers go into it trying to be creative and design the “answer” like Karsten was. At this point it’s tinkering proven designs and using marketing tactics to help them stand out.