Opinion & Analysis
FedEx Cup Playoffs points system still not right?
If we are measuring the FedEx Cup’s major points system overhaul in 2009 by its stated goal—to infuse more drama into the Playoffs finale—the sea change has been a resounding success.
Following a Vijay Singh performance in 2008 that left the Fijian basically a lock to win the Cup with two events to play, the PGA Tour tweaked its points system to put far less emphasis on tournaments prior to the Tour Championship in hopes that the final event’s new disproportionate influence would mean more dramatic conclusions.
The returns?
No eventual FedEx Cup champion has moseyed into East Lake needing only a pedestrian finish to cast in the $10 million prize. The three Tour Championships following the Singh yawner produced high-profile, intense battles for the FedEx Cup crown. In 2009, there was Phil and Tiger. The next year, Jim Furyk faced a manageable but pressure-packed up-and-down for the jackpot. In 2011, Bill Haas pulled off one of the most memorable shots in Playoff history to capture the glory.
Really in every sense of that narrowly proscribed objective, the PGA Tour has received its wish. The same Tour Championship that Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson skipped (voluntarily) in 2006 now serves as the centerpiece for the PGA Tour’s end-of-summer drama.
But has too much been compromised in the process? More and more that seems to be the case.
We’re all pro-drama here and likely nobody wants to see a return to the doldrums of the initial FedEx Cup setup, but the current format has grown stale.
With Billy Horschel’s double-victory in the season finale, the last five winners of the Tour Championship also captured the FedEx Cup in the year of said triumph. Woods is the only FedEx Cup champion under the new scoring format to not also place first at East Lake.
While this sort of result is generally desirable for the Playoffs concept, the lack of diversity here is alarming. Part of the charm of this four-event end-of-season rendezvous is that, in theory, a player can capture the FedEx Cup in several different ways. Maybe eliminating the Singh method is prudent, but there’s something to be said for a guy needing to place second, finish top-five or post a top-10 at East Lake to capture the Playoffs. When a gaggle of players not winning the Tour Championship are jockeying for the position that affords them the FedEx Cup trophy, the dizzying shift from one potential winner to another can get crazy exciting and hectic.
The current format actually allows more players a chance to win it all at East Lake, but, paradoxically, makes it more likely to find just one avenue toward taking the Playoffs crown: winning the Tour Championship.
In the last five tournaments at East Lake, the double winner concept has not only been upheld but rarely challenged. In 2010, Paul Casey had a chance to win the Cup with a solo second and briefly appeared he might do so, but after that fleeting moment Jim Furyk and Luke Donald jockeyed for the victory they needed to take everything home.
A year later, Webb Simpson had a chance for the FedEx trophy down the stretch after a 22nd-place finish at East Lake, but the final action came down to Aaron Baddeley, Hunter Mahan and Bill Haas–three guys who started the tournament outside the top 20 in the standings and three guys who needed to win for FedEx Cup glory.
And the last three iterations really didn’t acknowledge the possibility of a non-Tour Championship winner’s shot at the FedEx Cup crown. To be fair, the last two champions started the Tour Championship second in the standings, but from 2010-2012, the winners started 5th, 11th and 25th respectively.
What’s even the point of having a four-week playoff stretch if the writing on the wall says that for the most part only the Tour Championship is going to matter?
The points resetting prior to East Lake isn’t the issue, but rather its setup is the glaring flaw. The lack of clout for players at the top of the standings makes a non-East Lake winning FedEx Cup champion pretty improbable.
A low FedEx Cup winning total is 3,000 points, something only the top five in the standings can accomplish without winning the Tour Championship. Only the FedEx Cup leader can finish outside the top-five at East Lake and still win it all in this scenario and Nos. 4 and 5 must place at least solo second to have any chance.
Even Bill Haas’ low total of 2,760 is only reachable by non-winners among the top six in the standings, with the Nos. 5 and 6 players requiring solo seconds.
With this information, we should be screaming for a change to the points reset. In the current iteration, so few have a shot as non-winners. Why not tweak the points so that say the top 10 in the standings are significantly separated from the rest of the pack?
We’re not talking a massive overhaul. Give players in the top 10 500 or 1,000 more points after the reset than they currently get, or at least enough to make it quite difficult for the lower ranked players to take the Cup even if they win at East Lake.
In any given Tour Championship, the players vying for the FedEx Cup are those fighting for the tournament win and maybe, maybe the top couple of guys in the standings (of course some fit both categories). A reset more skewed toward the top would go toward eliminating the lower ranked golfers heading toward an East Lake victory.
But this is simple addition by subtraction.
Maybe less people have a chance at the Cup, but if those in the upper echeleon of the standings at East Lake are further advantaged and far less beholden to win or bust for the $10 million, the greater leeway means more names are in the running for the whole prize Sunday at the Tour Championship.
More names means more chaos and more drama.
The Tour Championship’s extreme grip is not the solo issue though. The Playoffs should offer more points than regular season events can and should reward the mediocre season-long performers that turn blazing hot in the postseason. But hasn’t moving up in the Playoffs become a little too easy?
Morgan Hoffmann started the FedEx Cup Playoffs 124th in the standings posted a solid but unspectacular T9 at the Barclays and jumped all the way to 72nd. He moved up 52 spots and basically had a spot at Cherry Hills based on one measly top-10.
That becomes a major issue when it comes to the field at East Lake. One would think the Tour wishes for the strongest group possible at the Tour Championship, its showcase final event.
When Playoff volatility is so large though, that objective suffers. At East Lake, you want a combination of regular season performers and hot postseason golfers. With this system, you sometimes get neither.
Players like Geoff Ogilvy, who moved from 100th to 24th in the standings with a runner-up at the Deutsche Bank, sneak into East Lake. No offense to the former U.S. Open champion, but one week of great play doesn’t a “hot” player make. Instead, you get a guy who played mediocre or poor golf more or less the entire year save one outlier week. Not exactly the type of competitor you want among the final 30.
We don’t intend to rid the system of the “Cinderella” playoff performers. But “Cinderella” should imply a standard of consistently great golf rather than one impressive week. Consequently points in the first three playoff events should be significantly diluted, if still plentiful.
This is not another article bashing the FedEx Cup. Whatever its flaws, the end-of-season extravaganza has infused much more energy into golf’s closing stretch.
Still, Tour brass should understand that the FedEx Cup can be improved. Stepping down the power of the Tour Championship and strengthening the finale’s field by way of more restricted point totals in the first three events can accomplish just that.
Few want to see the 2008 results again, but with the formula once again a cut, dried and somewhat hindering presence, maybe these tweaks are in order.
Club Junkie
Tour Edge Exotics mini driver review + TaylorMade Spider ZT Max first look – Club Junkie
On this episode of Club Junkie, I put the new Tour Edge Exotics Mini Driver to the test and break down the performance, forgiveness, distance, and where it fits compared to a traditional driver or strong fairway wood. If you have been curious about adding a mini driver to the bag, this one is worth a look.
I also dive into the new TaylorMade Spider ZT Max putter that was recently spotted and discuss the growing zero torque putter trend. Plus, there is a closer look at the new Project X Titan Yellow shaft showing up on the PGA Tour and what makes it different from other profiles currently out there.
Opinion & Analysis
AVL: We’re talking about practice! My best tips for taking your game to the course
With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game.
Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills.
While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice.
This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times.
Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy.
One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length. Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine.
It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season.
Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds.
Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time. With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game. Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills. While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice. This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times. Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy. One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length.
Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine. It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season. Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds. Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time.
Equipment
Seoul Sensibilities: Is Korean golf fashion starting to shape the world?
For Korean golfers, we always look forward to the last of the kkot-saem-chu-I for the true start of a new golf season. The term refers to a cold snap, but literally translates as “winter being jealous of the flowers beginning to bloom, thus lashing out one final time before surrendering to spring”.
A rather poetic mouthful packed into a short expression.
Koreans can be like that. Understated, yet oddly expressive at the same time. And nowhere is this more true on the golf course and in our golf bags. In fact, I suspect many Korean golfers look forward to new apparel and accessory drops more than they do actual equipment launches each year.

At this point, Korean golf fashion may exist on its own timeline. (courtesy of @seonbi_golfer)
There is ample evidence to support that suspicion. Korea is the world’s third-largest golf market behind the United States and Japan, yet its appetite for golf apparel exceeds that of both countries combined. Recent estimates suggest that Korea accounts for nearly 40 percent of the global golf apparel market, placing it among the world’s most influential golf fashion markets and punching well above its size.
Simply, we care deeply about how new golf clubs look and feel, but enjoy looking good while swinging them even more.
Golfers in the West may laugh and say that golf is played on a course, not a fashion runway. Perhaps. But what’s the harm in trying to look and feel good, if the added self-confidence can help actual performance? It certainly seems to have worked for Jason Day, who may have unlocked a new stats category: dormant strokes gained. Coincidence?

During the COVID-era, estimates placed the market near $9 billion, an astonishing figure for a single country.
As a proud member of Gen X, I’ve witnessed the highs and lows of golf fashion firsthand. The pleated trousers and wing-tipped shoes of Jack Nicklaus, the stylish plus-fours and knickers of Payne Stewart, the baggy black trousers and fitted mock-necks of Tiger Woods, and the thigh-hugging athletic tailoring of Rory McIlroy. Golf fashion, like the golf swing itself, has rarely stood still.
But nowhere have those trends shifted, evolved, and been scrutinized quite as relentlessly as in Korea. Here, golf fashion moves faster than fairway gossip, and consumers dissect brands with a level of discernment that can be both impressive and mildly terrifying. New brands are studied, judged, embraced, or dismissed with startling efficiency.
The result is a consumer base with one of the sharpest eyes for quality and authenticity anywhere in the world. It is difficult to quantify, but easy to recognize. Clean lines without trying too hard. Luxury mixed with utility. Trend awareness balanced by restraint and purpose.
It’s golf fashion shaped by one of the world’s most style-literate cities, something I like to call Seoul Sensibilities, referring to the taste level forged by a uniquely competitive environment.
And increasingly, global brands have noticed.

Many golf brands in Korea have their own flagship shops dedicated to apparel only
Titleist understood this years ago, when its apparel business in Korea took on a life of its own under new ownership and local direction. What had once been a straightforward extension of an iconic equipment giant became something sharper and more premium. By going all in on the serious Tour-player look (I couldn’t even fit into their XL sizes), Titleist struck the right chord with Korean consumers and helped its fledgling apparel business break into the mainstream. Titleist became a household name even for non-golfers who wore its caps, shirts, and windbreakers in daily life. In many ways, it proved that even heritage golf brands could carry real fashion credibility when viewed through a Korean lens.
Several years later, PXG took a page out of Titleist’s playbook and followed suit. Korean consumers helped transform the brand from one known largely for irons and loud commercials into something broader and more stylish. PXG apparel’s growth in Korea was explosive, where it found an early audience and turned the category into something more than mere logo merchandise. It is still hard to walk anywhere in Seoul without seeing its palindrome logo.
Malbon’s meteoric rise in the United States was genuine, but its ascent into a global golf lifestyle brand owes much to Korea, where it was elevated by a market already fluent in modern golf style. Korea did not simply embrace Malbon. It pressure-tested the concept, refined its appeal, and helped push it into the global spotlight.
As such, new brands may arrive from abroad, but more often than not, their sharpest evolution happens here. If a brand can earn credibility in Seoul, it’s deemed to have passed one of the toughest style audits in the game.
That is why the next meaningful chapter may not come from outside, but from a Korean brand moving in the opposite direction, carrying those Seoul Sensibilities outward as K-pop once did.

Play young Stay dope.
From Seoul, With Intent
Khalhon is a label that feels less like a trend-chasing newcomer and more like the product of a market that has already seen everything. Golfers here have long been surrounded by luxury logos, technical fabrics, and tour uniforms disguised as lifestyle wear and vice-versa. In other words, novelty alone rarely lasts here, and the Koreans seems to understand that instinctively.
Its style language leans into clean silhouettes, relaxed but tailored proportions, muted palettes, and premium materials that speak quietly but confidently. There is a modern city aesthetic running through it all, with strong layering pieces, thoughtful textures, and subtle branding that suggests sophistication rather than demanding attention.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
Most importantly, the garments seem designed to blur the line between golfwear and everyday style. Shirts, trousers, knitwear, and outer layers move comfortably between a game of screen golf, a lunch reservation, an airport gate, or an afternoon coffee in Gangnam with friends.
It raises the question of whether this is golfwear that happens to look good off the course, or everyday clothing that performs beautifully on the fairways.
Personally, I have long appreciated Nike Golf for its clean, athletic modernization of golf attire. It also has the useful side effect of making me look like a more serious golfer than I probably am. But off the course, there are times when being instantly identified as the golf guy in a crowd of non-golfers can feel a touch self-conscious.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
That is part of what drew me to Khalhon, which seemed to blend golf and everyday wear naturally. While some of the outfits may be slightly beyond my personal confidence level, the brand also offers tasteful options for older guys like me who still want to express a little personality without regretting the decision later.
These are not simply flashy outfits worn on the course and then banished to the closet until the next tee time. They work surprisingly well off the course too, and I suspect many of the pieces will still look right a couple of years from now, which would certainly be kinder to my wallet than most golf fashion trends tend to be.
And perhaps that broader lifestyle positioning also helps explain why someone like Sean Wotherspoon would find Khalhon creatively interesting in the first place.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
“Korea is not only one of the most fashion-forward golf markets in the world, but one of the most fashion-forward markets globally. Korea is ahead, and I love to watch and try to catch up.” – Sean Wotherspoon, Creative Director at Khalhon
Seoul and Beyond
If Khalhon’s rise says something about where Korean golf fashion is today, its relationship with Sean Wotherspoon says even more about where it is heading.
For readers less familiar with Sean Wotherspoon, his arrival at Khalhon is not some routine celebrity endorsement or influencer collaboration. In design and streetwear circles, Wotherspoon is regarded as one of the more influential creative voices of his generation, particularly when it comes to blending nostalgia, storytelling, and contemporary culture into products that people can connect with.
He first gained widespread attention through his now-famous Nike sneaker collaborations, where his vintage-inspired designs and instinct for color helped turn him into one of the defining artists of the late-2010s sneaker era. His work gradually expanded beyond footwear into apparel, automotive collaborations, collectibles, and broader lifestyle design.
Modern golf style now extends well beyond the fairways, where performance and functionality are largely expected by default. And while plenty of brands already make technically competent golfwear, Khalhon seems more focused on designing clothes people would genuinely want to wear even after the round ends.
And when guys at Wotherspoon’s level show genuine interest in working with a Korean golf brand as its new Creative Director, fashion circles tend to sit up and pay attention. There’s already a huge buzz among the fashion-conscious here about upcoming collabs with iconic sports stars and brands.

“My creative direction for Khalhon is disruptive, colorful, nostalgic, and modern. My goal is to blend these avenues seamlessly within each collection.” – Sean Wotherspoon
In chatting with Sean, what stood out most to me was how genuinely energized he sounded about the project itself. Despite having already worked across and countless other creative spaces, he described golf as a completely fresh category for him, saying that Khalhon “will be an amazing vehicle for my design work.”
At the same time, his enthusiasm seemed tied just as much to Korea itself. He spoke openly about admiring Korea’s fashion culture while repeatedly insisting he is still a terrible golfer.
There was something oddly refreshing about that humility. Rather than sounding like a celebrity parachuting into golf simply because the category suddenly became fashionable, Sean sounded genuinely curious about what Korea might do with the category next.
And perhaps that is what makes Khalhon feel interesting right now. The brand feels less like a trend-chaser and more like the natural result of a market now confident enough to export its own point of view.
For years, global brands came to Korea to sharpen their image against one of the most discerning audiences anywhere. Now, a Korean label appears ready to send those Seoul Sensibilities outward instead.
Which brings us back to kkot-saem-chu-i.
That final cold snap before spring always arrives with a reminder that seasons are changing, whether we notice it immediately or not. Golf fashion feels a little like that right now as well, as the old boundaries between sport, streetwear, luxury, and everyday style continue to soften.
And somewhere in Seoul, a Korean golf label already seems prepared for whatever season comes next. I just hope they have everything in my size.




ken
Sep 24, 2014 at 12:59 pm
Increase the number of regular tour event requirement from the current 15 to 18.
Exclude Majors from point consideration.
The first event in the FedEx Cup should remain as it is.
The next event should be cut to 64 players.
Then change to match play. Cut the field to 32 players.
The losers play on day one( Wednesday) in a 36 hole match play format. Those 16 players then are seeded against the 16 in the winners bracket.
On day two, those players meet to cut the field to 16 Then play another 18 to get to 8 players.
On Day three they cut it to 4. Then on Saturday cut it to 2 then on Sunday the final two players go at it for the Trophy and the cash.
If this loosely resembles the US Amateur, correct.
These guys are pros. They can handle the grind.
lakawak
Mar 8, 2016 at 6:49 am
Match play is the WORST way to determine a winner.
Rich
Sep 24, 2014 at 2:03 am
Majors should be worth a lot more than the 600 points given to them. How are they worth less than a quarter of the playoff events? Aren’t they still the pinnacle of golf? Not according to the fedex cup they’re not……….ridiculous
golfpro
Sep 24, 2014 at 12:45 am
Love the idea of no points. Just keep reducing the field! Its pretty much whoever wins the tc wins it all anyhow!
NaBUru38
Sep 23, 2014 at 4:33 pm
The Deutsche Bank, Barclays and BMW should give 1000 points, not 2500.
Instead of resetting points, the FedEx Cup winner should be decided on strokes. The season leader would get a 50-stroke “Wednesday” score for the Tour Championship, the second 60, the third 65, the fourth 68, the fifth 70, the sixth 71, etc. Then the Tour Championship would get a 10-stroke bonus. The player with less FedEx Cup strokes would get the 10 million dollar check.
Philip
Sep 19, 2014 at 7:08 pm
For me the reason for the current points system is to project the PGA Tour by doing the most to ensure the players who where in the limelight and winning all season are protected from leaving before the end for the playoffs. This helps to protect the big stars who try to peak for the majors and can often be burned out by the Fedex cup.
A player winning 1-2 majors and a few other choice tournaments being eliminated in the first cut is a nightmare for the PGA Tour. This is a result of many people watching their favourite player in golf and once that player is eliminated they move on. Whereas in team sports we each have our favourite team, but if they are eliminated we often move on to another remaining team to continue to watch until the end.
A lot of people do not watch golf, but watch a player. For team sports those same people watch the sport first and foremost, they have a favourite team, but they watch the sport till the end.
Philip
Sep 19, 2014 at 7:14 pm
And a big reason for this attitude difference is that in golf we are rooting for an “individual” – this is a lot more personal than rooting for a team.
Show
Sep 19, 2014 at 4:01 am
The problem is, guys like Woods only play 16 or 17 events. Other players like Furyk play 30 or more consistently.
Pure and simple, the points system is flawed. Look at what happened to Dustin Johnson. He got to take home money as he came in dead last to get into the PlayOffs and, to top it off, they didn’t give his place to somebody below who would have showed up!
The points are way too skewed as of now. It should be simply –
in a regular tournament, 70 players make the cut ? Then the winner gets 70, dead last get 1.
Same goes for Majors.
And once the players know this, and the fact that they would also have to play a minimum of 25 events in a season, and to accumulate enough to just to get to the PlayOffs at the end –
if the pressure is on like that – they will show up and try harder.
They coddle the players too much. Too much sponsor money, too much power of the players’ union, too many exemption rules and too many injury exemptions.
Themaddriver
Sep 20, 2014 at 8:43 am
Proclaimer, I do not like NASCAR. However, I do like their “win and your in” theory. The more wins you have during the regular season should have a direct impact on your seed at the Tour Championship. The guy with the most wins gets the number one spot. This puts a significant emphasis on winning and could bring better fields to all tournaments. This could potentially eliminate players like TW from playing in less than half of the events. The nonwinners thusly are jockeying for the last few remaining spots in the Tour Championship. They can keep the points system the same for everything else including the Tour Championship.
Gazza
Sep 19, 2014 at 1:01 am
Winners of the majors should automatically qualify for the final field of 30.
Show
Sep 19, 2014 at 3:56 am
No, they shouldn’t. Because, they could just as easily not play other events as well. Or even turn up!
w
Sep 19, 2014 at 9:18 pm
the Fed Ex cup is suppose to crown the best PGA Tour player. Majors are not pga tour events. they should be kept separate. this would put more importance on regular season events.
MHendon
Sep 19, 2014 at 12:01 am
Damn you write the most long winded articles Kevin. I don’t think I’ve yet to finish reading one of yours.
AJ
Sep 19, 2014 at 2:09 am
Have to say I agree. Kevin, part of being a skilled writer is brevity.
Please can you work on breaking down your articles some more – for the amount of points you eventually raised this article should have been half the length, if not shorter.
Re the FEC, I think the whole contrived playoffs system is a load of bull anyway. It will rarely, if ever, reward the best player over the season but it’s a common feature of American sports so that why we have it.
I don’t follow US sport but the playoffs must drive you mad if you support the most consistent team, albeit there is something to be said for having slightly more unpredictability around the end season.
The football season here in the UK can become pretty dull if a single team is running away with the league or the same few teams are duking it out each season. That said, I would argue that most fans here prefer that to the relative lottery of a play off system to decide our national champions.
Airbender
Sep 18, 2014 at 11:34 pm
I think its fine the way it is.
Even in every other sports, everybody that’s in the playoffs should have a chance to win. My two cents…
bradford
Sep 19, 2014 at 9:31 am
Then it should be harder to get in–Horchel’s season was pretty meager, he shouldn’t have had a shot at it.
Jason
Sep 18, 2014 at 10:04 pm
I like using the points for regular season okay to make the playoffs. After that, the points are gone, and it’s true playoffs. Each tourney, half of the field is eliminated. Now, if you’re looking for drama, that is the formula. I think the PGA Tour got too creative with the point system for the playoffs, and basically over thought such a simple task. To me, it isn’t exciting watching all of these points scenarios play out over the course of the round. It’s far easier and interesting to just say, “Whoever wins this tourney is the champ.”.
I know some folks will say, “Well, what about the guy who played well all year? Shouldn’t he at least get something in the playoffs for that?”. The answers is no. In any other sport, regular season is nearly forgotten once the playoffs come around. The player who played well all year and gets knocked in round one of the playoffs can sit home and count his earnings and watch the drama unfold.
I really hope the PGA Tour chnages this system. It’s far too complicated for such a simple desire. My message to it: Keep it simple stupid!
Billy Joe
Sep 18, 2014 at 9:10 pm
Nothing against Billy Ho, but this FedEx Cup was like watching a car rust. Not sure what needs to be done, but it needs a tweak. Maybe like the Tour de France has various jerseys.
Simples
Sep 18, 2014 at 6:49 pm
If it is going to be Match Play, knock-out stage type set up, then they would have to randomize the next-round players from stage to stage, as they do with the FA Cup in England for their football championship. It would be more fun & exciting that way.
Simples
Sep 18, 2014 at 6:44 pm
Points should be for the regular season to get into the PlayOffs.
Then, no more points.
Once you’re in, it should purely be a cut-down from week to week in the Final 4 events, where you have to make the cut. 125, then 100, then 75, then 30.
Match-Play seems like a good idea, in the style of tennis or any other sport with knock-outs, but would not make real sense, as there’ll be guys sitting around for days doing nothing. Would not be good viewing for the crowd or for TV.
Simples!
Alex
Sep 18, 2014 at 5:09 pm
I think it should be 3 tournaments where all 125 play, then top 32 make it to the finals or top 30 and have it match play. If its top 30 top 2 seeds from the first 3 tournaments get byes. And then it should be match play, however i was thinking instead of match play where by hole, you have 18 hole match play relative to par.
Then every shot would count, and par 3 6th where someone goes into the drink and your opponent gets a birdie its not just 1 up but it could be as much as 3-4 strokes.
Kris
Sep 18, 2014 at 5:01 pm
I’m all for a Match Play in the final. But I think it should be true playoffs. Make the cut to move on. Top 100 plus ties make cut in Rd 1, then top 100 after done move on (playoffs if necessary at end). Same for top 60 in 2nd round. No cut in 3rd Rd so just top 32 into the final match play.
RobG
Sep 18, 2014 at 5:00 pm
I like the idea of using the points during the regular season to determine rankings but once the playoffs start the points should go out the window and the standings should be based on score relative to par.
The playoffs should be 16 rounds – 4 four-round tournaments with cuts to 100, 70, and 30 after 4, 8, and 12 rounds respectively.
The Barclays, Duestche Bank, BMW, and Tour Championship can still crown their own 4 round champion (tournaments within the tournament) but the FEC champion should be the guy who shoots the lowest score over 16 rounds.
This effectively eliminates guys who skip an event and situations where DJ doesn’t tee it up for 3 months and still makes it to the Tour Championship.
Chris
Sep 18, 2014 at 4:42 pm
The Tour Championship should be a match play event of the top 32. Imagine the final match for $10 million! Talk about drama.
Teaj
Sep 18, 2014 at 4:54 pm
I agree, my buddies and I have talked about this at length and we all agree it should be match play once it gets down to the last 32. every shot would have that much more pressure and I feel you would find out who has the right stuff.
Joe
Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 pm
The PGA wouldn’t do matchplay. Let’s say the first round it’s Phil vs Tiger and right off the start one of the two are out. Bad for business. I’m not gonna lie, this tour championship wasn’t the best and last years was worse. I think the points need to be redone. Rory won 3 of the biggest tournaments of the year. He deserved to win in my opinion. And they need to bring the BMW back to Cog Hill.
bradford
Sep 19, 2014 at 9:35 am
Match play only measures each player against one other player…Perhaps for the final 2, but it just doesn’t ever highlight who’s playing best. It’s a style that particular player excel in, but it’s not appropriate for large groups of players.